Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Fixed megapixel export

Kommentare

3 Kommentare

  • Ray Harrison

    I don't have a work-around while you wait for something like this, but for me, one of the significant challenges with "gimme-a-specific-file-size-no-matter-what" is the potential significant degradation in image quality across a set of images. I've found that 10 images might have significantly varying degrees of image quality depending on the amount of brute-force compression needed to get to the given size. I've really enjoyed the JPEGMini Pro plugin for Capture One to balance out image quality and file size. I don't think they allow for a specific size (which I appreciate) but they do have nice algorithms that can significantly reduce the file size while maintaining  great image quality. It works seamlessly with Capture One on export and they also have plugins for Lr/Ps (both of which natively do brute-force compression at the expense of image quality to get to some desired file size). Worth a shot if any of this is a concern. Obviously, if you have to upload to sites that are strict in requiring specific file sizes that are below the typical output sizes of high-or medium-quality JPEG, then you have to work with what you've got.  

    Good luck with your request!

    0
  • JR Peterson

    Ray Harrison  -- thank you for your comment, I'll look into that as I also have a separate problem that may solve. However for this request, I'm specifically asking about a fixed number of pixels (in megapixels), not fixed file sizes (in megabytes).

    I'm very happy for the jpeg algorythm with a normal quality number to do it's work after the image has been sized to the right number of pixels.

    (edit: formatting)

    0
  • Ray Harrison

    Ah, forgive the misreading :-(. I went and read the discussion link you provided to get clarity on the ask and I think it makes sense now. Maybe I still have it wrong but it seems like you want to maintain pixel density on the long and short edges (or square)  by scaling density as appropriate. Or am I still off in left field?

    0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.