Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Manufacturer profile vs specific lens profile

Kommentare

7 Kommentare

  • Ian Wilson
    Moderator
    Top Commenter
    Which produces the best results? If you take an image of something that would make it obvious (such as a boring head on photograph of a brick wall) which one gives you better correction of distortion?

    Ian
    0
  • BF
    Conversation Starter
    Ian3 wrote:
    Which produces the best results? If you take an image of something that would make it obvious (such as a boring head on photograph of a brick wall) which one gives you better correction of distortion?

    Ian

    Honestly, difficult to say…
    The Phase One profile seems to apply a stronger correction, and crops a little bit more. As for a preference to one or the other, I don't know.

    I think what I was getting at but did not formulate clearly was: if there is a manufacturer profile, why did Phase One create its own profile in some cases?
    0
  • SFA
    bernardf wrote:
    Ian3 wrote:
    Which produces the best results? If you take an image of something that would make it obvious (such as a boring head on photograph of a brick wall) which one gives you better correction of distortion?

    Ian

    Honestly, difficult to say…
    The Phase One profile seems to apply a stronger correction, and crops a little bit more. As for a preference to one or the other, I don't know.

    I think what I was getting at but did not formulate clearly was: if there is a manufacturer profile, why did Phase One create its own profile in some cases?


    Usually because there is a feeling that for some lenses in some usage situations there may be a better profile possible.

    Historically and perhaps before agreements with 2 significant manufacturers were completed, the access to the Manufacturer Lens Profiles may not have been fully available for some reason. In which case a C1 profile might have been a necessity.

    More recently lenses from the manufacturer's concerned seem to have defaulted to the Manufacturer values rather than pass through the full C1 assessment process and have a new profile created. I can't be certain about that but it is an impression I get. Maybe an owner with recently released hardware could comment?


    Grant
    0
  • BF
    Conversation Starter
    In the case of the 10-24mm, I think I saw the "Manufacturer profile" first, only inmore recent versions (couldn't say when) did the Phase One profile appear.
    0
  • SFA
    bernardf wrote:
    In the case of the 10-24mm, I think I saw the "Manufacturer profile" first, only inmore recent versions (couldn't say when) did the Phase One profile appear.


    That is possible of course.

    If someone decided that a different approach than the Manufacturer Profile might be worth producing they might have put an example of the lens through the lab analysis.


    Grant
    0
  • Paul Steunebrink
    bernardf wrote:
    ...
    However, for lenses such as the 10-24mm where both profiles are available, the results are different. How is this possible, and which one should be used?

    That results are different is a result of different corrections in the respective profiles, obviously.

    Capture One first tries to apply their lens profile. If not available, the manufacturer's profile. In case that also does not exist, you have the manual options with sliders and checkboxes.

    Based on that logic, Capture One assumes that their profile is best. 😉
    0
  • BF
    Conversation Starter
    Paul_Steunebrink wrote:

    Based on that logic, Capture One assumes that their profile is best. 😉

    I guess 😂
    0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.