Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Use of iCloud For Picture Storage | Any C1P Considerations?

Kommentare

7 Kommentare

  • cdc
    Would you be doing this for backup purposes only or everything lives on the cloud type of situation?

    As you know Adobe has their own cloud services an ecosystem and they seem to be pushing for cloud based backup & editing & everything. They implement the use of smart previews which makes their cloud experience rather smooth and quick in my experience, in fact culling images using the browser based LR online can be faster than using LR classic with locally stored images.

    Capture One can't compete with that, they don't offer any cloud services that I know of. I don't know how well C1 would work accessing a catalog from the cloud but something tells me it could end up being troublesome. If you want the fastest experience with C1 store your images locally then perhaps move them to the cloud, an external drive, or both, after you're done working with them.
    0
  • Emile Gregoire
    I have my Pictures and Desktop folders synched with iCloud and it works perfectly as a cloud-type backup solution. It does however not free up disk space if that's your goal, as they'll simply reside both on your ssd or harddisk *and* in the cloud. I hope in the future Apple will provide options to selectively keep folders in the cloud only, but that day hasn't yet come...
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Hi Everyone and thanks for the comments and suggestions!

    It looks like it will be "possible" to use C1P with a pictures folder that's primarily hosted on iCloud.

    I was aware that there would be a local copy of all image files on my MBP, that syncs up to iCloud for with any changes.

    I do agree that there could be a C1P performance/usability consideration for preview generation.

    I backup my images to an external SSD currently, which saved the day last week when my MBP died.

    I'll think about this some more before acting.

    We'll see if there is any other feedback.

    Thanks again.
    0
  • Emile Gregoire
    I haven’t noticed any performance penalty as the files reside on your ssd. The only difference is they are uploaded in the background to iCloud. I have about 200Gb of photos synced that way and it works faultlessly.
    0
  • Jochen Schmidt
    I did store all my sessions in a Dropbox Pro folder. That way I could manually select a session to be "online only". Or download it by switching from "online only" to "local". If I just wanted to access a RAW or output/ photo I just could access them using the finder.

    I dropped Dropbox (duh!) because the kernel extension did bad things to my system. Now I'm using Resilio Sync - which is a BitTorrent based sync app which also supports folders with partial online/offline sync. It is a one time pay. The files are stored on an ssd at my iMac and synced with all devices syncing that folder (iPad Pro, iPhone). Resilio Sync exists also for some NAS so you could add a NAS for backup purposes
    0
  • Keith Reeder
    [quote="Ice9ine" wrote:

    - As Adobe encourages customers to move their photo libraries to Adobe Cloud (which of course is an income generator for Adobe)

    Wow! Imagine that - a business, doing things to make money...

    🤓
    0
  • Gregory Edge
    Why would you rely on a cloud to store your files? I would use a cloud for backup but not my main file storage. If the internet is down you can't get to your stuff.

    Buy yourself a good external drive with Thunderbolt 3 and use that. Then use a cloud service to back things up.

    I have been happy with Backblaze for backup. In addition I take advantage of my Amazon Prime membership and store a second copy of my library there for just in case.
    0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.