Dedicated OpenCL board combined w/ standard graphics?
Hi all.
https://www.phaseone.com/de-DE/Search/A ... cleid=1720
Based on the given url, I currently try to figure out, if it's supported to run Capture One 8.x/9.x with a low performance graphics card in combination with a dedicated OpenCL board, all with passive cooling?
By using passive cooling it's indispensable that the ventilation delivery rate (CFM or L/s) is provided by e.g. appropriate (bigger) cooling fans in the system unit.
For instance the following three combination examples:
NVidia NVS 300 combined with Tesla K40
AMD/ATi FirePro 2460 combined with FirePro S9150.
Matrox C420 with either NVidia Tesla or AMD/ATi FirePro board.
So the OpenCL board as frontend next to the CPU is responsible for rendering and processing and the low perf board as a backend framebuffer for driving 24" and/or 27" monitor(s), all with passive cooling and all boards interconnected over PCIe lanes.
Questions:
1. Would CO8/9 recognize this kind of configuration?
2. Is someone using this kind of combination with CO8/9?
3. Which combination (manufacturers) consisting of dedicated OpenCL and graphics board are known to be stable with Windows 7/10?
Usually you didn't drive such a combination, unless you maybe need more (supported?) performance than with "bundled" solutions like Quadro (e.g. M5000) or FirePro (e.g. W7100) boards. I'm just wondering why PhaseOne is listing these products under their OpenCL support site. Who is using CO8/9 with rack servers e.g. HPE? Interessting. 😕
https://www.phaseone.com/de-DE/Search/A ... cleid=1720
Based on the given url, I currently try to figure out, if it's supported to run Capture One 8.x/9.x with a low performance graphics card in combination with a dedicated OpenCL board, all with passive cooling?
By using passive cooling it's indispensable that the ventilation delivery rate (CFM or L/s) is provided by e.g. appropriate (bigger) cooling fans in the system unit.
For instance the following three combination examples:
NVidia NVS 300 combined with Tesla K40
AMD/ATi FirePro 2460 combined with FirePro S9150.
Matrox C420 with either NVidia Tesla or AMD/ATi FirePro board.
So the OpenCL board as frontend next to the CPU is responsible for rendering and processing and the low perf board as a backend framebuffer for driving 24" and/or 27" monitor(s), all with passive cooling and all boards interconnected over PCIe lanes.
Questions:
1. Would CO8/9 recognize this kind of configuration?
2. Is someone using this kind of combination with CO8/9?
3. Which combination (manufacturers) consisting of dedicated OpenCL and graphics board are known to be stable with Windows 7/10?
Usually you didn't drive such a combination, unless you maybe need more (supported?) performance than with "bundled" solutions like Quadro (e.g. M5000) or FirePro (e.g. W7100) boards. I'm just wondering why PhaseOne is listing these products under their OpenCL support site. Who is using CO8/9 with rack servers e.g. HPE? Interessting. 😕
0
-
Usually those expensive CAD cards aren't good value for money when it comes to OpenCL.
Right now, I would call the new water-cooled AMD/ATI Fury X the best in performance vs noise (and at moderate cost as well). Currently we also advice that for Multi-GPU operations, you buy the same card. Otherwise the distribution of data is skewed, and the hardware is not fully utilised.0
Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.
Kommentare
1 Kommentar