Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Windows-based PC for Capture One

Permanently deleted user
Hi,
I'm trying to build new PC, mainly for using with C1 nad PS.

Unfortunatelly there is no C1 benchmarks on the internet.

So my question is:
- i7 4790k or i7 5820k - if 2 cores more give me noticeable more performance and if few hundreds euros more for x99 platform is worth it
- GTX 970 vs R9 290x - which graphic card has better support in C1

I found thread about benchmark value in logs:
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=18167&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

So maybe someone could provide opencl benchmark for those cards (or similar like gtx 980, r9 290 etc.).
I think that main difference would be nVidia vs AMD. And I can't find anything about nVidia cards.

Regards,
Maciek
0

Kommentare

8 Kommentare

Datum Stimmen
  • Permanently deleted user
    I found some benchmarks for gtx 970. So I'm still looking for r9 290x.

    http://www.tonymacx86.com/graphics/1571 ... e-one.html
    0
  • Lionel12
    Benchmarking in general are good, as long as they target your most important work at hand.
    Inside Capture One we have a specific benchmark testing the "Capture One" relevant processing needs of the GPU.

    We also have similar tests for CPU usage. As a general rule of thumb, in Capture One we stride to use all available processing power, balancing load between the CPU and the GPU.

    In your specific case, go with the AMD 290x card, it is much faster (for Capture One) than the NVidia card.

    The choice of CPU is more tricky. The 5820k has 6 physical cores, the 4790x 4, but also an Intel 4600 GPU. Capture One utilizes all GPU's available, but load balancing a slow GPU (the Intel) with a very fast one does not make a lot of sense.

    The onboard CPU cache plays a big role as well. The 15GB cache of the 5820x and the 12 HT cores makes this the best CPU for your case - since Capture One will use all 12 HT cores giving the best CPU performance. This configuration happens to be very close to the Mac Pro maxed out system, a great Capture One performer. And BTW the more RAM the better. I would recommend at least 32GB.

    -Lionel
    0
  • dee jjjaaaa
    [quote="Lionel12" wrote:
    Benchmarking in general are good, as long as they target your most important work at hand.
    Inside Capture One we have a specific benchmark testing the "Capture One" relevant processing needs of the GPU.

    a chance to post some results of that benchmarking ? certainly with all the wording about lab conditions and that user mileage may vary and that it is not an endorsement of any manufacturer... whatever makes it possible (to post)
    0
  • Alain Decamps
    [quote="Lionel12" wrote:
    Benchmarking in general are good, as long as they target your most important work at hand.
    Inside Capture One we have a specific benchmark testing the "Capture One" relevant processing needs of the GPU.
    ...
    And BTW the more RAM the better. I would recommend at least 32GB.

    -Lionel


    Does adding more ram give a result, even if the process managers shows that C1 is NOT using all available ram (and far from it)?
    0
  • Filthy Lucre
    I noticed that my OpenCL benchmark score has climbed from ~1.0 to ~1.8 (i.e., it's now worse) after upgrading to version 8.2. Is this because the benchmark calculation has changed or is my card just less capable of running the new version?
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Thanks for the answers.
    I decided to go with 4790k and 32gb RAM. I have Radeon 7850 so I'll wait a moment for new Radeon 390x cards.
    I think that right now configurations with x99 and ddr4 ram are a little too expensive.
    (especially price of motherboards and RAM)

    With Radeon 7850:
    2015-03-29 17:49:49.141> OpenCL benchMark : 0.158222 😊
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    I have an older Saphire Radeon HD3850 512MB video card that has been driving a 1680x1050 monitor with no issue for years. No complaints with crashing or speed when using CO v8.

    I just got a 1920x1200 monitor and this HD3850 video card works just as well as with the above monitor.

    However I am considering changing it to a 2560x1440 monitor.

    My questions are:
    1. Will I start to find any issues in CO speed or memory/crashing with the additional resolution increase? (The HD3850 is spec'd to support 2560x1600). Not for gaming, just using CO.

    2. Any personal experience on a 24" 1920x1200 vs. 27" 2560x1440 monitor with CO?
    0
  • dee jjjaaaa
    16:10 is better than 16:9
    0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.