Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Camera (Input) Profiles

Kommentare

2 Kommentare

  • Jonathan Gilbert
    hello,

    The 1DS Mark II profile is going to be your most accurate starting point because it is created with the camera in a scientific environment to describe the cameras response. Adobe RGB is a generic color space that has no relation to the characteristics of the camera. When you set the color space in the camera it really only applies to shooting tiffs and jpegs. All that being said, if you prefer the colors from a different input profile, by all means go for it because color after all is subjective. 😄
    0
  • thowi
    [quote="worldsnapper" wrote:
    I can only select the generic 1DS MKII profile, which is considerably brighter and more saturated than the 'Adobe RGB 1998' profile, which was available in v3.7.
    Did you set AdobeRGB as camera profile in C1 V3x?? It's the wrong way.
    In V3 you set the camera profile and the working space (AdobeRGB) in the same tab:
    In V4 you set the camera profile in the quick tab and the working space (output) in the batch tab:
    If you set AdobeRGB as camera profile, AdobeRGB is assigned as input profile. Result: wrong colours and much too dark.
    Why?
    Colours: the AdobeRGB profile does not represent the colours captured by your camera.
    "Brightness": AdobeRGB has Gamma 2.2 the phase camera profiles all have Gamma 1.8. So if you assign AdobeRGB intstead of the camera profile as input, the image is getting darker.
    They right way is setting the right input profile (canon 1ds mkII generic) and to convert the image in your working space. If you set cm-setting as shown above everything should be fine.
    0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.