4.5，4.5 Pro and 4.1 comparison 1

EDB Zhou

• 24. Oktober 2008 20:49

It looks like 4.1 does a better job at demozaic.
The pictures below are processed by, from left to right, 4.5 (tif), 4.5 Pro (tif) and 4.1 (jpg 100%) under the exactly same settings. I don't have 4.1 tif fomart.
300% zoom
http://www.four-thirds.cn/forum/attachments/month_0810/20081024_017d85afbb26d23e7274RctrQXUUTzQm.png
500% zoom
http://www.four-thirds.cn/forum/attachments/month_0810/20081024_5d732556af438ad294c8RSFCDuCUYdBZ.png

0

• 

  Christopher

  • 24. Oktober 2008 21:02

  I'd say it looks like 4.1 is just smoothing the neighboring color components together more, and that 4.5 could retrieve more detail. But without a TIFF from 4.1 it is impossible to say, the JPEG compression throws out and ability to do pixel-peeping comparisons.
  
  How do they look at 100%? Printed? That's what matters.

  0
• 

  EDB Zhou

  • 25. Oktober 2008 03:24

  [quote="Christopher" wrote:
  I'd say it looks like 4.1 is just smoothing the neighboring color components together more, and that 4.5 could retrieve more detail. But without a TIFF from 4.1 it is impossible to say, the JPEG compression throws out and ability to do pixel-peeping comparisons.
  
  How do they look at 100%? Printed? That's what matters.

  
  
  I tried JPEG output at 100% from 4.5 Pro, the maze in the letter N still exists.
  It's not a problem of JPEG compression.
  
  At 100% zoom, the maze problem is barely noticeable.

  0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.