Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Is Capture One LE CPU utilization limited?

Kommentare

13 Kommentare

  • Roine
    Hello
    I think only C1 Pro supports more than one CPU.

    You have two in a dual core.
    0
  • Dajuan
    [quote="roine" wrote:
    Hello
    I think only C1 Pro supports more than one CPU.

    You have two in a dual core.


    Is this documented anywhere? I'm planning to upgrade from a dual core to a quad core processor strictly for improved rendering (video & still).
    0
  • Ulf Liljegren
    Hello

    Capture One 3.x on Windows support up to 2 CPU cores.
    On Mac it supports 8. I can not currently tell you what the future will bring but you are in for a pleasant surprise.
    0
  • Dajuan
    [quote="UlfLiljegren" wrote:
    Hello

    Capture One 3.x on Windows support up to 2 CPU cores.
    On Mac it supports 8. I can not currently tell you what the future will bring but you are in for a pleasant surprise.


    So C1 3.x supports dual core processing via both C1 Pro and/or LE version - that's good news. But why would CPU utilization apparently limited to ~ 50%? Is there a way use more (increase the utilization) and decrease the rendering time?
    0
  • NN2212
    [quote="UlfLiljegren" wrote:
    Hello

    Capture One 3.x on Windows support up to 2 CPU cores.
    On Mac it supports 8. I can not currently tell you what the future will bring but you are in for a pleasant surprise.



    Is the 2 CPU cores limited to Pro? I, too have tried LE 3.7.7 with dual core and never had more than 50% CPU utilization. If upgrading to Pro will let me use 2x as much CPU, I will do it.

    Great teaser for 4.0. I'm ready to beta test for you!

    Thanks,

    Paul Samuelson
    0
  • NN2212
    [quote="UlfLiljegren" wrote:
    Hello

    Capture One 3.x on Windows support up to 2 CPU cores.
    On Mac it supports 8. I can not currently tell you what the future will bring but you are in for a pleasant surprise.




    Is the multi-processor support cpu dependant?

    I have a dual 64-bit AMD that seems to use all of the processor(s), but my Core2Duo does not!

    Paul
    0
  • Dajuan
    [quote="paulsamuelson" wrote:

    Is the multi-processor support cpu dependant?

    I have a dual 64-bit AMD that seems to use all of the processor(s), but my Core2Duo does not!

    Paul


    Paul, let me get this right.

    On your AMD dual core machine, you get 100% CPU utilization on both cores when converting from raw to JPEG.

    But, on your Intel dual core machine, you only use 50% CPU utilization on both cores when converting from raw to JPEG?

    If both machines were doing the exact same job, does one complete the task faster than the other? If so, which one?
    0
  • NN2212
    [quote="Dajuan" wrote:
    [quote="paulsamuelson" wrote:

    Is the multi-processor support cpu dependant?

    I have a dual 64-bit AMD that seems to use all of the processor(s), but my Core2Duo does not!

    Paul


    Paul, let me get this right.

    On your AMD dual core machine, you get 100% CPU utilization on both cores when converting from raw to JPEG.

    But, on your Intel dual core machine, you only use 50% CPU utilization on both cores when converting from raw to JPEG?

    If both machines were doing the exact same job, does one complete the task faster than the other? If so, which one?



    Yes.

    Yes.

    Yes. The AMD is faster (which pisses me off, since Friday I ordered a Core2Quad for just this purpose).

    Paul
    0
  • NN311
    although I have not looked at CPU utilisation percentages, it seems my C1 LE (3.7.6) does make use of both cores in my Core2duo laptop. A certain job with 300 raw files is about 20 minutes faster than on my desktop (Athlon 64 3400+ single core 2.4GHz). Since the cores of my laptop run at 1.6GHz I guess both must be used in order to outperform my desktop.
    0
  • Dajuan
    [quote="j.haagsma" wrote:
    although I have not looked at CPU utilisation percentages, it seems my C1 LE (3.7.6) does make use of both cores in my Core2duo laptop. A certain job with 300 raw files is about 20 minutes faster than on my desktop (Athlon 64 3400+ single core 2.4GHz). Since the cores of my laptop run at 1.6GHz I guess both must be used in order to outperform my desktop.


    Might you be able to run a few images through your set up and share your CPU utilization on your Core 2 Duo laptop?

    C1 moderator has already confirmed C1 will use 2 cores, but utilization percentage is the outstanding item. I see only 50% usage on both cores, same as Paul above.
    0
  • Dajuan
    Would be nice if one of the P1 guys would chime in regarding CPU utilization. Please?
    0
  • NN2212
    [quote="Dajuan" wrote:
    C1 moderator has already confirmed C1 will use 2 cores, but utilization percentage is the outstanding item. I see only 50% usage on both cores, same as Paul above.



    My Core2Quad processor runs at 25% utilization when processing Fuji S5 files, although they do process faster (37 seconds) than Core2Duo or Dual Xeon processors (66 seconds).

    I will try to do more testing with different machines and file types to see what I come up with.

    Paul
    0
  • Roine
    On my HP compaq 9420 with core duo the cpu is running at 100% for both cores in C1 Pro for eath conversion, it drops a bit between eatch picture..

    I haven´t LE on this computer.

    Roine
    0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.