X100 RAF files and Library previews.!!
Other problem with X100 RAF files,and jpeg's previews in Capture One Pro 6.3.2 Lion 10.7.2 not properly rendered heavy pixeling on all images in Library previews even the Raw files a little less but noticeable.
Image files like Canon _MG_1121.CR2, Panasonic P1000409.RW2, Ricoh _0010759.DNG are rendered properly.!!
Any one an idea whats happening.!! 😕
Thanks in advance.
Image files like Canon _MG_1121.CR2, Panasonic P1000409.RW2, Ricoh _0010759.DNG are rendered properly.!!
Any one an idea whats happening.!! 😕
Thanks in advance.
0
-
Could you either or both:
- post a X100 RAF file for download (I have one, and not problem with it, but I want one of you 😁 ),
- post a screen dump here in the forum or for download?
And have you tried:
- switching off OpenCL in the Preferences, General tab,
- cleaned up your setup, in particular the preference file, application support files
- create a new session if you are on Pro or renewed the default session file?0 -
[quote="Paul_E" wrote:
Hi, Paul thanks for your reply, how can i post a srceendump,.!!!
Could you either or both:
- post a X100 RAF file for download (I have one, and not problem with it, but I want one of you 😁 ),
- post a screen dump here in the forum or for download?
And have you tried:
- switching off OpenCL in the Preferences, General tab,
- cleaned up your setup, in particular the preference file, application support files
- create a new session if you are on Pro or renewed the default session file?
Ps,
Opencl is off.
other files i din't touch yet0 -
Hi, Paul thanks for your reply,
OpenCL is off.
Created New Session file, ( no success )
And how do i post screendump can't figure it out.!!!
JC.0 -
[quote="coljohnny" wrote:
...
And how do i post screendump can't figure it out.!!!
You upload your screendump to a website/webservice where you can link to. Example of such a service is Tinypic or Photobucket. Or you can have your own server on the internet.
Next, you post the link to the image in your post her between "img" tags.0 -
Hi, Paul give it try now screendump,
http://i42.tinypic.com/2d79c9t.png[/img]/img]
Hope this wil works.
JC.0 -
[quote="coljohnny" wrote:
http://i42.tinypic.com/2d79c9t.png
Hope this wil works.
I removed the duplicate tags.0 -
I downloaded the entire screen dump and re-read your original post. Is it correct that your Browser thumbnails are jagged but the preview in the Viewer is fine?
Is it the same when you have Browser at the right or below?0 -
Hi, Paul Thanks in advance.!!
Browser thumbnails are jagged, right and below no difference.!! as you noted preview in Viewer is fine for the RAF files, jpegs in the Viewer are jagged as well.!!
Not on the screendump i send you.
JC.0 -
[quote="Paul_E" wrote:
Ps, Paul screendump with jpeg Viewer hope this will be helpful http://i42.tinypic.com/2iianux.png
I downloaded the entire screen dump and re-read your original post. Is it correct that your Browser thumbnails are jagged but the preview in the Viewer is fine?
Is it the same when you have Browser at the right or below?
JC.0 -
I noticed the jaggies in the JPEG's preview in the Viewer window. I think you have a fairly large monitor (the samples you posted are 1600 x 1000 pixels but I am not sure whether they were resized). Anyway, you should consider setting your preview size higher than default, if you have not done so already: Preferences, Image tab. Set to size of monitor (1600 px for example).
Next, allow CO6 regenerate the proxies. This will happen automatically when you browse the images, but you can enforce it by deleting the proxies when CO6 is closed and open it again.0 -
Thank you Paul, Monitor is Eizo S2243W ( 22" ) Resolution 1920x1200.!!
Image preferences set to 1600,1800, and higher accordingly to you suggestion, no effect on the preview's jaggies still there,
Regenerated preview's as well no effect.!!
So still don't know whats happening.
JC.0 -
I run out of options. Best to open a support case.
http://www.phaseone.com/supportmain.aspx0 -
Paul thanks fore you're effort and support to me, guessing it can only be done with a update 6.3.3 perhaps.!!!
Most regards, JC.0 -
[quote="coljohnny" wrote:
Paul thanks fore you're effort and support to me, guessing it can only be done with a update 6.3.3 perhaps.!!!
... if you give Phase One the input for the update: yes, perhaps.0
Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.
Kommentare
14 Kommentare