Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Capture one demosaicing on raw files

Kommentare

8 Kommentare

  • Permanently deleted user

    Hi Marc,

    It isn't clear, on your screenshots, which software is the best in demosaicing for reducing artefacts. It seems to me grain-like artifacts are worst in LR than in C1. However, you could try disabling hardware acceleration in the C1 preferences in order to see if it improves the result.

    1
  • Permanently deleted user
    Top Commenter

    It could be a camera-specific thing.

    For example the old Canon 7D had a reputation for "maze" artefacts, and I know from experience that Capture One was "good" at pulling them out at some expense to image quality, so it would help to know which Canon you're using here, Marc - your screenshots have something of this issue about them.

    I agree with Robert though - the Lr version actually looks much worse than the Capture One version, which is consistent with what I used to see with the 7D.

    1
  • Marc de Boer

    Keith-

    Thank you for your insights. I am using a Canon R5 now but I have seen the exact same behavior for a canon 5DIV.

    I do agree that the Capture One result is cleaner but somehow it renders more aggressively with darker pixels and random patterns creating a "blotchy" look. I could live with it as long as it takes the uniform approach from the Lightroom demosaicing

    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Top Commenter

    Hmmm... I shoot with a R5 myself, but - never feeling the need to view my files at 300% - I don't have a problem with smooth areas of images.

    Pixel-peeping doesn't have much to recommend it, in my opinion: if a problem isn't visible at the image level, it's not a problem as far as I'm concerned.

    With that said, it would be interesting to see if the same thing happens with files from, say, a Nikon body - that would help establish whether it's a Capture One problem or a Canon problem.

    0
  • Marc de Boer

    Hi Robert-

    I tried enabling and disabling hardware acceleration but I havent found any perceptible changes unfortunately.

    Thank you for the lead though.

    Marc

    0
  • Marc de Boer

    Keith-

    I am not much of a pixel peeper myself but I do make quite a big deal about such texture details as it affects all the 100.000's of images that go though my library every year. On screen viewing I usually don't pick up on it but with medium to large prints it does show on the smooth surfaces. I also never apply any noise reduction to make it smoother and therefore erase details. My personal taste is to keep some grain like structure in the image but like I said I don't find the structure in capture one very pleasing. I am afraid though that there is not much tweaking to be done to the demosaicing except applying another layer to taste (i.e. applying film grain over the demosaicing grain/artefacts.)

    Marc

    0
  • BeO
    Top Commenter

    Hi Marc,

    Unfortunately you cannot apply film grain as a local adjustment. If you open a feature request I will vote for it.

    The demosaicing result of C1 is indeed a bit coarser, in many cases this gives me a more lifelike result, in other cases a finer demosaicing would be preferable, e.g. for bokeh parts of an image,. As there are no details local applied NR can help.

    I often use a smaller sharpening radius with higher amount than the default settings are on the background layer and selectively add sharpening in layers.

    BeO

    0
  • Marc de Boer

    Thanks BeO,

    Yes I see what you are saying. I am not looking to apply any local adjustments though, just a universal texture adjustment throughout the frame. The capture one demosaicing doesn't bother me in detailed areas but I find it less pleasing in out of focus areas. I was hoping that changing any of the sharpening parameters would help and it does to a certain extent but not without affecting detailed areas in a big way.

    0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.