Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Support period for Perpetual Licenses?

Comments

3 comments

  • Mario Fantucci

    I had the same bad feeling of you. But I would like thinking that reality is not so "negative against perpetual customers". 

    Then first of all, I want to ask CaptureOne team to make available a table with all issuing dates for every update.   That is a missing information,  really due to all your customers.  Thanks

    2
  • Paul Steel

    Me too.  I just noticed the 16.5 release and downloaded it, upgraded my catalog calmly thinking all would be well given I only just paid for my Pro license on the 1st Sept '24.  Now on the 24th October I see that the new version isn't covered under the license I bought just about two months ago!  Looking at the cost of adding a further Pro license (with discount a further 179GBP) it'd be cheaper for me to join the Adobe Photographer's bundle crowd.. I'd have paid 360GBP for less than a year of capture one Pro...  I too aren't looking for major upgraded features but feel somewhat scammed by CaptureOne now :/

    As a side problem, I've now messed up my catalogue since it upgraded it on the new version post install so I have the hassle of going back to 16.4.6 and recreating my catalogue.

    2
  • itsenouphoto

    The update left me feeling pretty same. It seems I was careless when I bought a new perpetual license about a year ago and missed the news about the change in update policy. So after the new about update was posted, I opened C1 to work in it and waited for the offer to download update and now found out that I can't get this update

    I'm not too interested in these new trendy AI features. But it would be nice to get an update for bugs and missing basic features like batch processing for old-released HDR merging (for which I still keep the damn Lightroom on my PC, although I bought the new version largely for merging, which turned out to be impossible to use regularly)

    This is disappointment in the policy of a company that I always said makes a high-quality professional tool, unlike the superficial and poorly optimized Adobe. It seems that the difference between them is decreasing in the approach to features and in relationships with users both 

    1

Post is closed for comments.