Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

"Completed" is awfully deceptive

Logged

Comments

12 comments

  • Keith Reeder

    Back in the day, the old forum had a clearly-stated "don't post just to vent" rule.

    Time to reintroduce it, I think...

    -6
  • Rob

    Uhhhh, that's not venting. I'm posting to address a confusing feature of the site.

    I could by the same measure say that you're just venting about my post. 

    4
  • Rob

    I will note though that people seem pretty keen on commenting and downvoting to defend this mess of an application and forum, but so many posts go unaddressed when people actually need help. Maybe you could also refocus all that energy and answer some questions.

    2
  • Lily

    Hi Rob,

    The label "completed" on the forum is put for categorization purposes. It means that the request has been taken on board but that does not indicate that it has been already implemented. All users that would like the particular "completed" request to be implemented could still leave comments and vote.

    -4
  • Rob

    Then it should read “submitted”. You’re using “completed” to categorize your internal submission process, not our external request process. You’re showing us an internal label on a public forum. I’m not the only one to bring this up.

    6
  • SFA

    Rob,

    Indeed.

    But that's how some help desk applications work.

    It's semantics to discuss wording. More so if multiple languages are to be supported.

    In effect the task of forwarding the request is complete as Lily has pointed out.

     

    So long as people understand how it works any "word" or number could be used to categorise.

    -2
  • David Willis

    I agree that this terminology is confusing. I think it's because English is not their primary language. There are many strangely-worded terms in the actual software as well. And, for some reason, a cooking metaphor ("recipes") in the middle of a photography app.

    3
  • Mika Leinonen

    David,

    Would you like to use Capture One with Danish language user interface?
    That way there would be less "strangely-worded terms" and you could enjoy your editing better...

    -2
  • David Willis

    No. I don't speak Danish so the entire interface would be strangely-worded to me.

    I was coming to Phase One's defense here; offering a logical reason for the occasional awkward wording. You seem to have missed that...

    2
  • Chris Leutger

    I upvoted you Rob, this is a completely legitimate ask. There are words and phrases that would make much more sense than "completed" if it doesn't mean...completed. Which Lily told us that it does not mean completed. Like you said, "submitted" would be good. Or they could have a "never in a million years" that would give us a better sense of what's going on.

    5
  • picturesofewe

    "The label "completed" on the forum is put for categorization purposes. It means that the request has been taken on board but that does not indicate that it has been already implemented."

    Which is why it is confusing. If you want to categorize, use a color or arbitrary number. If you use a word (semantics) it would help if it meant what people expect it to mean. No one expects "completed" to mean you've completed reading the comment.

    3
  • Jürg Rast

    Sadly my search did not lead me to this request, therefore I created a new one here: https://support.captureone.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360014308018-Use-the-appropriate-status-for-feature-requests

    Basically my request just makes a proposal to use the existing tags "Planned" / "Not Planned" / "Completed" in a more logical way, at least as seen from the user perspective.

     

    1

Post is closed for comments.