Support of Hasselblad files 2023?

Dag Hansen

• November 18, 2022 09:45

Will CaptureOne 23 be the one that break this curse between CaptureOne and Hasselblad?  

Hope so, or CaptureOne 22 will be the last update i will buy.

1

• 

  Benjamin Kim

  • November 20, 2022 22:32

  So far, nope. Both Hasselblad and Capture One aren't really interested in collaborating. For Hasselblad, they have their own software. For Phase One, they are competing each other so there are no reasons to support them.

  1
• 

  FirstName LastName

  • November 28, 2022 14:56

  Capture ONE is not part of Phase One any longer and Phocus is a free and inferior product, so that can't be the reason!!

   

  I want to switch to C1 and I hope hearing good news soon

  1
• 

  Dag Hansen

  • November 28, 2022 16:08

  I found some one on the WorldWideWait and a way around it. I'm happy camper now!

  0
• 

  David Mantripp

  • December 10, 2022 16:43

  I don’t think it is fair to say that Phocus is inferior to CaptureOne.  Certainly it is less complex, has no management functionality, and has a lot of room for improvement, but on my non-cutting edge system it is as responsive as CaptureOne and produces excellent output.  It does require a certain amount of investment in learning it to get the best out of it. So does CaptureOne.

  But yes, it is getting a bit old, this lack of support.  I suppose one issue is that Hasselblad would need to share proprietary information on their HNCS for CaptureOne to provide output competitive with Phocus. I imagine there could be some barriers there….  Apart from Lightroom, which has a degree of Hasselblad input, and satisfies some Hasselblad owners, DxO Photolab and Iridient Devloper have “independent” support for X1D. Neither seems much used by owners.

  So yes it would be nice to have support from CaptureOne one, but only a fully baked Hasselblad-supported and approved solution would be worthwhile. So us X system owners need to pressure Hasselblad as well….

  1

Post is closed for comments.