Propheticus
- Total activity 392
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 46
- Subscriptions 141
Comments
Recent activity by Propheticus-
BeO I'm not so sure this is introduced in v16. I'm still on V15.4.2.10 and also see a brief (0.1sec) blur when I do any non-detail edit (so exposure) at higher zoom levels 67% and 100%. I've got m...
-
Stefan Trucker The possibility of updates is mentioned in the agreement (eula), but no commitment to the period during which you're entitled to them. Under EU law that would imply no (right to) up...
-
You will get some bug fix releases Unless you happen to buy 16.3.2 and they decide the next release is 16.4.0. Then you get 0 bug fixes. C1 could however use feature flags, allowing the user to i...
-
I've also mentioned that 6 months period before. Actually I believe software should (at least) receive a year's worth of support including bugfixes. Since they seem so set on limiting the right to ...
-
Are you aware this is a public forum where everyone can see the full name and email you put in the title of this post?
-
To me it sounds like first you forcefully removed all Edge related stuff (which includes EdgeWebView) and now undid part of this by re-installing the Edge WebView2 runtime. WebView2 runtime is seen...
-
It makes sense to drop the version numbering (22, 23, 24) from your name because of your push towards a subscription service. There no longer is a distinction in versions towards the subscribers, t...
-
Tim van der Leeuw Exactly the same experience. Input 3 frames separated by 2EV, with 1 or even 2 frames having non-overblown data for a certain highlight area in it > output still has overblown hig...
-
It's been a topic that more users have asked about. So far it seems a conscious decision and working as designed. See this thread for example and the commentary of user 'Noob with a Nikon' who said...
-
That's interesting. So you found out it was actually the downscaling from a larger resolution preview to a lower resolution display that is blurry. Perhaps they use a 'fast' cubic resampling filter...