メインコンテンツへスキップ

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

New MacBook Pro - is a lot of RAM important?

コメント

13件のコメント

  • Permanently deleted user
    Hi,

    The release notes say "16+ GB RAM".
    I have 16 GB, and I sometimes use C1, Affinity Photo, and Photoshop simultaneously open, and I haven't any issue.
    0
  • Stefan König
    [quote="tenmangu81" wrote:
    Hi,

    The release notes say "16+ GB RAM".
    I have 16 GB, and I sometimes use C1, Affinity Photo, and Photoshop simultaneously open, and I haven't any issue.


    thx for the fast reply. That gives hope 😄 😎
    0
  • photo by FA
    Maybe it is enough today, but nobody can guarantee down the line in 3 years time. So, if you can spend extra 400EUR, I'd suggest to do it.
    0
  • Stefan König
    [quote="fatihayoglu" wrote:
    Maybe it is enough today, but nobody can guarantee down the line in 3 years time. So, if you can spend extra 400EUR, I'd suggest to do it.


    Yes, that´s true. I have to think about it.
    Thx for your post.
    0
  • cdc
    I think you'll be fine with 16gb unless your editing video or processing very large files (big stacks/panoramas, lot of PS layers, etc). Even then everything will still work, it'll just bottleneck and slow down. I think you'll see more of a day to day difference if you put money towards upgrading the CPU & GPU. I've got a 13" MBP w/16GB ram running 36mp files through it and the only bottlenecks I ever see are CPU bound (2.6GHz i5).
    0
  • Stefan König
    [quote="CDC" wrote:
    I think you'll be fine with 16gb unless your editing video or processing very large files (big stacks/panoramas, lot of PS layers, etc). Even then everything will still work, it'll just bottleneck and slow down. I think you'll see more of a day to day difference if you put money towards upgrading the CPU & GPU. I've got a 13" MBP w/16 GB ram running 36mp files through it and the only bottlenecks I ever see are CPU bound (2.6GHz i5).


    Hi CDC,

    THX for your reply. I'm absolutely with you for now. But the new mac book pro should last for the next 3-5 years for me. So I have chosen the 32gb MBP. Who knows what comes in the next 2-3 years. The technological progress runs fast.

    THX for all your comments.

    Always good light! 😊
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    I'm inclined to the "16 GB is enough" camp. Reason: when the Mac "runs out" of memory, it swaps some of the memory contents to main drive (page/swap activity). That could be pretty slow when the "main drive" was a spinning disk. But recent MBP "drives" are extremely fast solid state memory. Not as fast as RAM, but awfully fast. I'd lean toward putting the money toward a larger drive than more RAM. Unless you're working with large video, PS, CAD or similar files, I'd be surprised if most users would be bothered by page/swap activities, but you'd definitely be bothered if you ran out of disk space.
    0
  • SFA
    [quote="Nature Isme" wrote:
    I'm inclined to the "16 GB is enough" camp. Reason: when the Mac "runs out" of memory, it swaps some of the memory contents to main drive (page/swap activity). That could be pretty slow when the "main drive" was a spinning disk. But recent MBP "drives" are extremely fast solid state memory. Not as fast as RAM, but awfully fast. I'd lean toward putting the money toward a larger drive than more RAM. Unless you're working with large video, PS, CAD or similar files, I'd be surprised if most users would be bothered by page/swap activities, but you'd definitely be bothered if you ran out of disk space.


    But when you do run out of memory the disk swapping activity can be quite significant -- and you will always end up running out of disk space no matter how much you start with. 🤓


    Grant
    0
  • cdc
    [quote="feinklick" wrote:


    Hi CDC,

    THX for your reply. I'm absolutely with you for now. But the new mac book pro should last for the next 3-5 years for me. So I have chosen the 32gb MBP. Who knows what comes in the next 2-3 years. The technological progress runs fast.

    THX for all your comments.

    Always good light! 😊


    Probably not a bad choice, all things being equal I'd rather have 32gb ram as well. And ideally one would be able to max out RAM, CPU, GPU, & SSD specs. Just keep in mind that you'll only see a performance increase at times when 16gb ram is not enough, which could be never depending on your needs, where as upgrading the CPU will show increased performance every time you use the computer, and an upgraded GPU will help with faster preview generation of images and processing out images in Capture One every time you use it.
    0
  • Stefan König
    THX for all your help.

    Since the planned device is currently not available, I have decided for the following device

    MacBook Pro 2,6 GHz, 32 GB RAM, 560X, 512 GB SSD.

    I think, this one should be really fine with C1 as well. 😁
    It should be enough for the next few years. I hope...
    0
  • photo by FA
    I'd also bump up GPU. Although CO uses OpenCL now, soon they will have to use Metal which will bring some possible performance increase. You are right about not choosing i9 processor as the review says it gets hot quickly and hit throttling issue.
    Again think about, how long you want to use and how much money you can spend most. It is Apple, famous with non upgradable parts 😊
    0
  • Stefan König
    [quote="fatihayoglu" wrote:
    I'd also bump up GPU. Although CO uses OpenCL now, soon they will have to use Metal which will bring some possible performance increase. You are right about not choosing i9 processor as the review says it gets hot quickly and hit throttling issue.
    Again think about, how long you want to use and how much money you can spend most. It is Apple, famous with non upgradable parts 😊


    Yes AppleË‹s upgrade politic is really bad... 😁

    The vega was out of my budget. 3170 Euro was my absolute limit for the configuration in the post above. Unfortunately the prices in Germany are a lot higher than in USA.
    0
  • photo by FA
    [quote="feinklick" wrote:
    [quote="fatihayoglu" wrote:
    I'd also bump up GPU. Although CO uses OpenCL now, soon they will have to use Metal which will bring some possible performance increase. You are right about not choosing i9 processor as the review says it gets hot quickly and hit throttling issue.
    Again think about, how long you want to use and how much money you can spend most. It is Apple, famous with non upgradable parts 😊


    Yes AppleË‹s upgrade politic is really bad... 😁

    The vega was out of my budget. 3170 Euro was my absolute limit for the configuration in the post above. Unfortunately the prices in Germany are a lot higher than in USA.


    I guess you can recover what you need with a eGPU in the future 😊
    0

投稿コメントは受け付けていません。