Intelligent parallelization
Hi.
Just needed to say that its stupid that they put so much work in parallelizing proxy creation for each single image, but then they do not generate multiple proxies at once, which could be MUCH faster if you have many cores.
Just my 2 cents.
Just needed to say that its stupid that they put so much work in parallelizing proxy creation for each single image, but then they do not generate multiple proxies at once, which could be MUCH faster if you have many cores.
Just my 2 cents.
0
-
So are you going to raise a support case and make a formal feature request of this? 0 -
I think if one has to suggest the obvious, its not worth the hassle 😎 0 -
[quote="Christian192" wrote:
I think if one has to suggest the obvious, its not worth the hassle 😎
I think it's a pity that you devaluate your own suggestion when you are pointed into the proper direction. It is worth a better treat.0 -
The point is, Christian, that it's probably safe to assume that Phase One is well aware of the advantages of parallelisation, and may well be working on improving Cap One's use of multiple cores as we speak - and I agree with you completely that we'd all be happier if all cores were used to create proxies (the time it takes to build proxies is the one thing about Cap One I'm not keen on).
But it's possible that this isn't seen as as high a priority as we might consider it to be, in which case a support case feature request might be just the nudge that the developers need to make it a higher priority.
Besides, you've been on here long enough to know that if you want Phase One to take official notice of a suggestion or an issue, a support case is the way to go - it's certainly a waste of time simply to complain about something here.0 -
A support case gets results, plain and simple.
Although valuable information is shared on the Forum, it is designed as a User to User channel. The Support System is designed as a User to Phase One channel... doesn't get more clear than that.
Our programmers and R&D team are always busy at work, narrowing down issues that we supporters bring to their attention. Issues that are brought to our attention from concerned and proactive customers that create support cases. Although it would be ideal to have the Programmers and R&D team religiously keep up with the forum, it's just not practical... especially when you consider there is already a clear and concise channel set up for that User to Phase One communication to be facilitated. Also, if that were the case I might be out of work. So help me keep my job and create a support case, I'll take it from there 😄0
投稿コメントは受け付けていません。
コメント
5件のコメント