メインコンテンツへスキップ

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

how many are using 9.1

コメント

9件のコメント

  • alessandro ceccnoi
    i am using it. It is not perfect but certainly better than 9.03
    0
  • John Doe
    Except for the "sort by name" bug, it seems to work fine here.
    0
  • Ario
    No problem here.
    0
  • HansB
    I sandboxed 9.1 and use it for testing only. I like what I see there.

    9.1 solves most of the issues I found in 9.0.3. Just the memory eating bug on close one session/catalog - open another and crop reverting to inches still annoy me.

    But in my catalogs (all are referenced) I still rely on the folders in the library tab. And they are unsorted and the whole 'Folder'-content of the Library keeps vanishing randomly. Sometimes it even shows the catalog as completely empty, 0 images.

    I really hope to see v9.1.1 with a fixed library soon. Can't wait to use it.


    Regards,
    Hans
    0
  • NNN635158767546269381
    I am using 9.1.

    A part from "Sort by name..." being extremely slow (and sometime you have to kill the app), it works fine and better as 9.03.

    Take care
    0
  • EnderWiggins
    I'm using 9.1 with referenced files, no issues on my machine.
    0
  • NN635770922769309595UL
    No problems here.
    0
  • photo by FA
    Not much problem here, except the know catalogue issues and OpenCL issue on iMac 5K late 2015 max out system

    P1 is looking to the OpenCL problem and as far as I know they are aware of the catalogue problems which they say they'll fix it with the new release.
    0
  • chmod
    Working without issue on my end.

    I only add the need for serious CPU is becoming more obvious as file sizes increase.

    CPU and RAM are crucial for fast performance, and there is no way around them.
    0

投稿コメントは受け付けていません。