メインコンテンツへスキップ

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

High Pass Filter

Tonyh-s
Hi, Is Capture One able to imitate the High Pass filter of Photoshop, or would I still need to access Photoshop to get the High Pass filter effect? I use it a lot on my aviation photos.
Regards
Tony
0

コメント

8件のコメント

日付 投票
  • Permanently deleted user
    You can crank it up, but I think it's best to use the RAW sharpening as capture sharpening in C1 and then finish it off in photoshop after it's been re-sized for print. If you crank it up too much, I tend to see kind of wormy artifacts from C1 sharpening method. I make sure to check the diffraction correction and then I keep the default capture sharpening in the program and turn off noise reduction. It then goes to photoshop where it's sized for print and sharpened. I usually use smart sharpening or usm but high pass is good too.
    0
  • Tonyh-s
    Thanks for that. If I still need Photoshop, then I might as well stay with Lightroom as well for the moment as both are on the CC package. When it gets closer to the renewal date I will look into CP1 again.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="Tonyh-s" wrote:
    Thanks for that. If I still need Photoshop, then I might as well stay with Lightroom as well for the moment as both are on the CC package. When it gets closer to the renewal date I will look into CP1 again.


    The RAW processing of Capture One is far superior, so you kinda end up needing both. I understand the pain.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="Tonyh-s" wrote:
    Thanks for that. If I still need Photoshop, then I might as well stay with Lightroom as well for the moment as both are on the CC package. When it gets closer to the renewal date I will look into CP1 again.


    Yes I understand the situation as I have both myself. That being said, C1 is so much better than LR/ACR that it's worth any extra trouble to me and don't want LR/ACR to touch any RAW files. Only thing I use LR for now is making panos since it outputs a DNG file which is way cool 😊
    0
  • Tonyh-s
    I agree the editing of C1 is far better than LR, but the cataloguing is decades behind LR! it is slow and does not allow you to stack jpg with Raw to tidy up the catalogue. If Phaseone could concentrate on bringing up the catalogue to the same quality as their editing, C1 would be a game changer! Still I have paid for LR until April, so I have until then to decide what to do.
    0
  • cdc
    I use both Capture One and Lightroom. I don't find CO1 to be far better than LR. In some aspects sure, like tethering and certain tools that exist only in CO1. But generally speaking I can get a pretty great looking photo out of either program and each has its advantages and disadvantages.

    On this note, I'm curious how you guys that are saying CO1 is superior can you share in what ways you see it being superior to LR?
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="Tonyh-s" wrote:
    I agree the editing of C1 is far better than LR, but the cataloguing is decades behind LR! it is slow and does not allow you to stack jpg with Raw to tidy up the catalogue. If Phaseone could concentrate on bringing up the catalogue to the same quality as their editing, C1 would be a game changer! Still I have paid for LR until April, so I have until then to decide what to do.


    I've actually never liked catalogs and as far as I know, C1 does not recommend using a catalog. I use the "sessions" workflow with Capture One and it works perfect. Catalogs just seem to slow everything down and when you move files, things are all jacked up.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="cdc" wrote:
    I use both Capture One and Lightroom. I don't find CO1 to be far better than LR. In some aspects sure, like tethering and certain tools that exist only in CO1. But generally speaking I can get a pretty great looking photo out of either program and each has its advantages and disadvantages.

    On this note, I'm curious how you guys that are saying CO1 is superior can you share in what ways you see it being superior to LR?


    Well quite simply, I get a better, sharper image for my D810 with much better color rendering and night and day better with skin tones. ACR/LR seems to wash the colors out for whatever reason in their default rendering of the RAW file which I've noticed for years and is generally why people say that the RAW images lack life and color. What I do to compare is open a RAW in C1 and then export it to PS. I then open a RAW in ACR/LR and export to PS. Copy and paste the ACR/LR image and stack it as a layer in PS above the C1 image and then turn it off and on and see for yourself. I'm sure it's different for every camera but for mine, it is truly night and day. There's some other things as well like the highlight recovery and shadows slider seem much more realistic to me, and the capture sharpening is custom for each camera sensor. With the diffraction correction on and capture sharpening on, the sharpness of the RAW file is extremely hard to duplicate in LR/ACR. In the end, I feel like I have to edit less since the image already looks much better to start with and I'm not spending as much time with color correction.
    0

投稿コメントは受け付けていません。