メインコンテンツへスキップ

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Phantom Keywords Will Not Stay Deleted

コメント

6件のコメント

  • Peter Wijn
    I have experienced that wrong metadata saved in files, and removed later can pop-up again in a different software.
    In my case written in iView Media (upon which Capture One database is built), and read in Lightroom and in Photo Supreme.

    I tried to remove the metadata several ways, like with capture NX2 (Nikon files). I didn't make a job of it thought. Just remained surprised.

    (I have not tried Capture One database yet, because I am very content with IDimager Photo Supreme.)

    I guess it is something within the files?
    0
  • SFA
    Have you checked for a User Keyword library?

    user>appdata>local>captureone>keywordlibraries

    Anything there?


    Grant
    0
  • Seymour Heiney
    Grant, the KeywordLibraries folder is there, but its empty. Still no resolution.

    I guess I could start over with a new catalog, but until I know why this is happening, it likely will just occur again. Of the 200 or so photos I've imported thus far (all old jpegs from over 10 years ago), I looked at every one of them manually via Exif Pilot and deleted the IPTC and XMP data from the files, just to avoid this exact situation. I don't have any customer keyword list built, and these keywords, which I recognize as the ones I used in Lightroom, just keep show back up. I'm not even sure what photo(s) are the ones causing this (if indeed an image file is the culprit at all) because there is no evidence attached to any files when viewing them in Exif Pilot, Capture One or Bridge. I even removed them all from the catalog and reimported...no love. I'm not sure what the connection is here, but obviously something is amiss. I guess its time to open a ticket with C1 support.

    While I'd like to use C1 exclusively, as a photo editor AND a DAM (after all I don't have that many pics), if the keywording is that buggy, I may have to just use it as an editor and export to LR for management.

    Jim
    0
  • SFA
    Do you have any XMP Sync activity going on anywhere?

    There are many posts here about this situation often related to LR imports it seems. And catalogues.

    More so for older versions though.

    Some have found solutions.

    I'm normally a sessions user and stopped using LR many years ago in favour of something else well before I tried C1 so these problems are not something I have experienced personally. Finding the posts in the forum will likely give you better insights related to your own experience than I can offer relating things second hand (having covered the basics ....).

    A Support Case would also make sense.


    Grant
    0
  • Seymour Heiney
    Grant, no sync activity going on that I am aware of. In fact, the computer I had LR installed on, and where the LR catalog resided, bit the dust about a month ago, and neither LR or the LR catalog have been loaded on the computer I am now using. Only C1 is installed. My photos have always been referenced, but I actually did some folder renaming and moved the hierarchy to a new passbook external before C1 knew anything about them. So I'm pretty sure there is no longer any LR "sync" type issues here. Yet obviously LR has some type of influence or embedded something in the image files that I cannot see using EXIF tools. I'm going to try a few things, then open a support ticket. If I could narrow it down to the "offending" photo(s), I might have a chance to uncover a solution.

    Jim
    0
  • SFA
    Jim,

    It certainly very odd.

    Some random thoughts.

    C1 tries to be helpful by making previously used keywords available and to some extend, at the catalogue and session level, it seems to do some harvesting on the fly.

    Not sure where that might turn up but I wonder if one of the log files might have some related entries.

    Also I wonder about hidden files that might be keyword catalogues but invisible to the user if not the system.

    Finally, as might apply in a session structure, whether the Cache folder that stores thumbnails and preview files could be a source for the words.Or even some deleted image files that you will not see unless heading into the system trash and so on.

    All rather vague I'm afraid but it does sound like you have any other possibilities already covered by your approach to the problem.

    Grant
    0

投稿コメントは受け付けていません。