New Filled Adjustment Layer - Easiest Way to Do This?

Sean Murphy

• 2018年06月06日 16:27

Is this the easiest way to create a new Filled Mask Adjustment Layer programmatically? (aside from hitting a keyboard shortcut)

tell application "Capture One 11"
set SelectedVariants to selected variants
repeat with a from 1 to count of SelectedVariants
set thisVariant to item a of SelectedVariants

set LayerNames to name of every layer of item 1 of thisVariant
set layerCount to count of LayerNames

set newLayerName to make new layer of thisVariant with properties {name:"Filled Layer " & layerCount}
set layerName to name of newLayerName

tell layer layerName of thisVariant
fill mask
end tell

end repeat
end tell

Obviously, there is some extra code in there so I could name the layer how I want and number the layers, but wanted to see if anyone had figured out some options quicker than: 1. Get the variant. 2. Create new layer. 3. Set variable to the newly created layer's name. 4. Fill that layer's mask. Just feels roundabout.

0

• 

  Eric Valk

  • 2018年06月07日 11:26

  Hi Sean
  Well you could certainly tighten up the code a bit.
  
  If there was property of "layer" that included mask fill you could reduce the three "working" lines to two, but I don't see such a property.
  
  
tell application "Capture One 11"
repeat with thisVariant in (get selected variants)
set newLayerIndex to 1 + (count of every layer of thisVariant)
make new layer of thisVariant with properties {name:"Filled Layer " & newLayerIndex}
tell layer newLayerIndex of thisVariant to fill mask
end repeat
end tell

  or even better
  
tell application "Capture One 11"
repeat with thisVariant in (get selected variants)
set newLayerIndex to 1 + (count of every layer of thisVariant)
set theNewLayer to make new layer of thisVariant with properties {name:"Filled Layer " & newLayerIndex}
tell theNewLayer to fill mask
end repeat
end tell


  0
• 

  Sean Murphy

  • 2018年06月07日 13:46

  Thanks for the code cleanup Eric! Great to see how these things can be tightened up, but at least I was correct in understanding that there wasn't a simpler line of code like you mention about a property of layer for mask fill.

  0

投稿コメントは受け付けていません。