Huge memory (or resources) usage in CO10
Hi guys,
Yesterday I made a fresh & very clean install for the new version of Capture One, after deleting everything from the previous version, including the remaining files that the uninstall process omitted and also the registry files. After that I wanted to see what's new and test the software, so I imported 909 files from my RAW archive, some smaller files of 10MP made with a Canon 40D long time ago. These files were previously adjusted in CO9 (but very lightly) and during the importing dialog box, I selected to include the existed adjustments when importing the files (they were linked to sidecard XMP files). Adter 30-40% during the import session, I started to test the program with the files that already imported, the first ones. First thing I noticed is that the previous adjustments weren't there, all the files looked like fresh imports and the second and worst of all is that is a memory hog and CPU too, not optimized, or I don't know, but it's a huge downhill from the CO9 in terms of speed. After the importing session finished I tested more images, and in total, with the importing time, I had opened the CO for about 45 minutes. After about 30 minutes the program seemed almost unresponsive, and minutes after closing it became a real struggle even switching from image to image, images with no adjustments on them. When I tested the program, I used only the primary sliders, no masks, no something advanced, something that took about 2 min per image. In CO9 this sort of things updated instantaneous. Although I do like and I see a slight improvement in IQ rendering, I think something should be done with the optimization. Prior closing the program, the memory utilization was sky rocket to almost 9GB out of 16GB, with only CO opened and Firefox with a few tabs opened.
In terms of my PC specs I have an i7-3770K, overclocked to 4,4Ghz per core, 16GB RAM DDR3, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 as the HDD, and an MSI 7850 OC 2GB DDR5 256bit as the graphics board. The OS is Windows 7 SP1 64 bit, and the OS was freshly installed recently.
Nevertheless, comparing the two versions on the same configuration and OS, the new one is a huge disappointment. If this is how it handles 10MP files, 30+MP files I believe it would be terrifying. Seems like a program that is struggling with even the basic things.
In the end, I deleted all the catalog files and I said I wouldn't work in the program until you solve the problem with an update, an urgent one in my opinion. It's really frustrating and I really don't have an ancient PC.. if it were the case, CO9 would present the same or almost the same issues.
Yesterday I made a fresh & very clean install for the new version of Capture One, after deleting everything from the previous version, including the remaining files that the uninstall process omitted and also the registry files. After that I wanted to see what's new and test the software, so I imported 909 files from my RAW archive, some smaller files of 10MP made with a Canon 40D long time ago. These files were previously adjusted in CO9 (but very lightly) and during the importing dialog box, I selected to include the existed adjustments when importing the files (they were linked to sidecard XMP files). Adter 30-40% during the import session, I started to test the program with the files that already imported, the first ones. First thing I noticed is that the previous adjustments weren't there, all the files looked like fresh imports and the second and worst of all is that is a memory hog and CPU too, not optimized, or I don't know, but it's a huge downhill from the CO9 in terms of speed. After the importing session finished I tested more images, and in total, with the importing time, I had opened the CO for about 45 minutes. After about 30 minutes the program seemed almost unresponsive, and minutes after closing it became a real struggle even switching from image to image, images with no adjustments on them. When I tested the program, I used only the primary sliders, no masks, no something advanced, something that took about 2 min per image. In CO9 this sort of things updated instantaneous. Although I do like and I see a slight improvement in IQ rendering, I think something should be done with the optimization. Prior closing the program, the memory utilization was sky rocket to almost 9GB out of 16GB, with only CO opened and Firefox with a few tabs opened.
In terms of my PC specs I have an i7-3770K, overclocked to 4,4Ghz per core, 16GB RAM DDR3, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 as the HDD, and an MSI 7850 OC 2GB DDR5 256bit as the graphics board. The OS is Windows 7 SP1 64 bit, and the OS was freshly installed recently.
Nevertheless, comparing the two versions on the same configuration and OS, the new one is a huge disappointment. If this is how it handles 10MP files, 30+MP files I believe it would be terrifying. Seems like a program that is struggling with even the basic things.
In the end, I deleted all the catalog files and I said I wouldn't work in the program until you solve the problem with an update, an urgent one in my opinion. It's really frustrating and I really don't have an ancient PC.. if it were the case, CO9 would present the same or almost the same issues.
0
-
Hi,
Now I suspect that the problem I have reported in this thread () might be related to what you describe. I'm using a catalog and the crash due to a memory shortage happened just after the first launch while C1 was probably rebuilding the previews (cache).
I never could reproduce the problem but I guess it's because C1 didn't have to run again such a memory consuming task.0 -
I've had the same problem for a long time (since version 8 ). I believed it may have been related to Canon files, but that problem was apparently fixed. Phase One support haven't, to my knowledge, acknowledged a problem with Catalogs as they are today, and I've not seen any best practices suggested. There are a few messy workarounds (which I am stuck with, as I unfortunately decided to keep my archive in a Catalog), but long story short, it isn't usable for me, on high spec Mac or PC SSD systems, with my 5DIII, 7DII, 7D, and 5D files. 0
投稿コメントは受け付けていません。
コメント
2件のコメント