Nikon D810 SDK
Had a look on https://sdk.nikonimaging.com/apply/ and the sdk for the D810 is not released yet, perhaps this might be holding up an update for C1, the NEF RAW SDK is up on this site, that's presumably why Adobe has a result with Camera RAW 8.6. The SDK for the D4s was released by Nikon on the 16/05/2014, camera was released front end of March so two months after the camera, guess we may have a wait…. ☹️
0
-
... maybe!
Again, I can't say it enough... we're working on it and everyones patience is appreciated.0 -
Ok bearing in mind that the SDK has been released for the file format, hence Adobe camera RAW 8.6. It would be just amazing if we could process our captured to memory card images in C1Pro, therefore keeping our work flow intact, I may speak for myself, but tethered would be just great, but have no immediate expectations, bearing in mind that the SDK has not been released. Hey Drew, any chance of this….? 😄 0 -
Lightroom 5.0 has support for the D810 according to its website. 0 -
Hi,
Yes it does it's Adobe, so uses the Camera RAW 8.6 Plugin, utilised by photoshop, bridge etc.0 -
The SDK is now available from Nikon.
https://sdk.nikonimaging.com/apply/
So a C1 Pro that works with the D810, hopefully sometime soon….? 😄0 -
Support just told me there were unable to give any indication as to the timing of D810 support. Can anyone from Phase One provide a very rough indication - not a commitment, not something you need to be held to, just the broadest of guesstimates (i.e. something just a little bit more specific than 'as soon as we can'). I completely understand you're working as hard and as fast as possible, it would just be very helpful for planning purposes to get some idea.
Out of interest, why don't the camera manufacturers work with the important software companies in this space before the launch of a new model? This may not be the correct analogy but it's not as if Intel would put a new chip into the market without giving Microsoft more than just a heads up...0 -
Soon. Thats as specific as I can be. 😉
The SDK was JUST made available yesterday so, we're having a look at it now and will release an update when we can successfully implement support.[quote="NNN635427605552427095" wrote:
Out of interest, why don't the camera manufacturers work with the important software companies in this space before the launch of a new model?
Some certainly do, Sony for example is quite good to us. However, not all companies like to cooperate for the greater good ☹️0 -
Some certainly do, Sony for example is quite good to us. However, not all companies like to cooperate for the greater good ☹️
Do you think there is anything we (the Nikon customer) can do in terms of feedback to encourage greater cooperation in the future? I suspect I'm being naive but it is a ridiculous situation. I've been modifying the metadata of my D810 files to get CO7 to import them (I know, you don't approve!). It's crazy to think this kind of crude hacking is required to develop photos from a new Nikon model, just because they haven't invested more time in working with PhaseOne in advance.0 -
The beta supports the D810 so how are you saying you are just barely going to look at D810 support now that the SDK is out? DxO didn't need the SDK. Adobe didn't need the SDK. And it doesn't appear that Phase One needs the SDK since you already support it in a beta that was released before the SDK was available. 0 -
[quote="Gregory" wrote:
The beta supports the D810 so how are you saying you are just barely going to look at D810 support now that the SDK is out? DxO didn't need the SDK. Adobe didn't need the SDK. And it doesn't appear that Phase One needs the SDK since you already support it in a beta that was released before the SDK was available.
I normally don't respond to these type of posts, but I'm gonna make an exception.
There is a reason why folks tend to use C1 vs LR or DXO. Its about the look that C1 gives.
If it takes 'em a little longer to get the recipe right, then so be it.
I have a good feeling that Nikon is harder to deal with in general. Look how long it took Profoto to get Nikon TTL in their air remote. Same goes for Pocket Wizard.
Do ya want it fast or right?0 -
[quote="Jimmy D Uptain" wrote:
Do ya want it fast or right?
BOTH!
The forced workflow change has cost me dearly. RAW file support should be a separate update to version upgrades.0 -
Where is this update, i Bought this software in the hope that the Nikon D810 raw update would be released shortly. ☹️ 0 -
[quote="NN635429690439986810UL" wrote:
Where is this update, i Bought this software in the hope that the Nikon D810 raw update would be released shortly. ☹️
Would it kill you to actually read what has been said by Phase One on this thread? You'll get the update when you get it.
Phase One never pre-announces, and there was no basis whatsoever for you to assume that you should buy the software because there'd be a release "shortly".
If you want to guarantee support from your converter of choice, wait until support is delivered before you buy your new camera. It's that simple, and Phase One didn't force you to buy a D810.0 -
[quote="photohq" wrote:
RAW file support should be a separate update to version upgrades.
And it would still take as long as it takes. The process itself takes time, and that won't change simply because Phase One chooses a different delivery mechanism.
There are also a slew of logistical and resourcing reasons why this idea is a non-starter, but they should be obvious enough not to go into here.0 -
[quote="Gregory" wrote:
DxO didn't need the SDK. Adobe didn't need the SDK. And it doesn't appear that Phase One needs the SDK since you already support it in a beta that was released before the SDK was available.
Because "support" means not only camera support but tethering support: the SDK is necessary for tethering, and if Phase One simply released a version of Capture One that only supported the NEFs, all we'd see is an unending torrent of complaints about lack of tethering support - which is exactly what happened on the Lightroom forum.
And DxO doesn't provide tethering anyway.
I don't blame Phase One one little bit for wanting the whole job - Raw support and tethering support - done in one go...0 -
[quote="Jimmy D Uptain" wrote:
[quote="Gregory" wrote:
The beta supports the D810 so how are you saying you are just barely going to look at D810 support now that the SDK is out? DxO didn't need the SDK. Adobe didn't need the SDK. And it doesn't appear that Phase One needs the SDK since you already support it in a beta that was released before the SDK was available.
I normally don't respond to these type of posts, but I'm gonna make an exception.
There is a reason why folks tend to use C1 vs LR or DXO. Its about the look that C1 gives.
If it takes 'em a little longer to get the recipe right, then so be it.
I have a good feeling that Nikon is harder to deal with in general. Look how long it took Profoto to get Nikon TTL in their air remote. Same goes for Pocket Wizard.
Do ya want it fast or right?
Of course I want it right. The first version of Adobe's profiles for the D810 were terrible (posterization issues). They fixed them a few days later and look quite good now. DxO looks very very good as well.[quote="Keith Reeder" wrote:
[quote="Gregory" wrote:
DxO didn't need the SDK. Adobe didn't need the SDK. And it doesn't appear that Phase One needs the SDK since you already support it in a beta that was released before the SDK was available.
Because "support" means not only camera support but tethering support: the SDK is necessary for tethering, and if Phase One simply released a version of Capture One that only supported the NEFs, all we'd see is an unending torrent of complaints about lack of tethering support - which is exactly what happened on the Lightroom forum.
And DxO doesn't provide tethering anyway.
I don't blame Phase One one little bit for wanting the whole job - Raw support and tethering support - done in one go...
That's the answer I was looking for. The SDK is used for tethering only? It sounded like Drew was saying that they'll finally take a look at suport now that the SDK is out. Since there's a beta already out with profiles built for the D810 that confused me. How much is the SDK used for profiles? Or is it only used for tethering?0 -
SDK is for camera communication.
File Support is built independent of SDK.
The SDK is out now, so we can begin finalising support for a release. Thank you for your patience.0 -
[quote="Keith Reeder" wrote:
And it would still take as long as it takes. The process itself takes time, and that won't change simply because Phase One chooses a different delivery mechanism.
What does that even mean? Why would not separating RAW file support from version upgrades simplify and speed up the delivery of such file support?[quote="Keith Reeder" wrote:
There are also a slew of logistical and resourcing reasons why this idea is a non-starter, but they should be obvious enough not to go into here.
I'd like you to go there, please enlighten me.0 -
.... well this doesn't look like it's going in a positive direction 😐
Support is coming soon. Thank you all for your patience on the matter.0
投稿コメントは受け付けていません。
コメント
19件のコメント