メインコンテンツへスキップ

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Full frame image size in CapOne is smaller than in Lightroom

コメント

17件のコメント

  • Nikon Shooter

    You can allocate greater real estate to the viewer
    by narrowing the tools and browser panels.

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    Thank you. Maybe I wasn't clear.

    It's not about the viewer or the size of the image displayed on screen. The actual file sizes are reduced from the native resolution of the camera. A 24.1MP file size is 6016 x 4016. Every image shot directly form the camera is this same size. However, when CapOne imports them the file sizes on many of the images seem to have been reduced from the camera's output. Is that clear? It's no longer a 24.1mp file it's a smaller file size. Some file sizes are reading, 5763 x 3847 like they have been cropped or something. The same images in Lightroom read 6016 x 4016.

    0
  • Nikon Shooter

    I am using a few bodies and two of them are D850's and 
    not s ingle pixel is missing.

    Here is a side by side finder window and CO info

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    Yes my images say the same for my camera which is a d750 in my case 4016 x 6016. However when I export them some scale down to 3906 x 5851 without any editing have been done to them. Here is an export from LR and CapOne. Notice the resolution on each.

    0
  • Nikon Shooter


    Just check the Basic tab of the Process Recipe tool under the Output Tool Tab.


    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    Yes I did. Notice that under process summary for my 4016 x 6016 PSD file it says: Size: 3906 x 5851, Scale: 100%. It should be 4016 x 6016.

    0
  • Nikon Shooter


    That beats me Ken, I haven't had nor heard of that issue before.
    Sorry I was of no help.

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    I know weird huh. If I change it to "dimensions" and put in the camera resolution of 4016 x 6016 rather than "Fixed, look what happens. Scales up to 103% to match.

    0
  • Nikon Shooter

    But you upscale to 103%! 

    I work in the publishing industry and this is quite taboo
    unless publishing for billboards.

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    Exactly. Don't want to do that. Don't know why CapOne is not exporting the image at native resolution. LR does not do this. Thanks for all. your help! appreciate it.

    0
  • don maclean

    On the Adjustments Panel what is your Crop set to? Usually it should be Respect Crop.

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    Hi Don. Yes it says Respect Crop

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    And if you tell it to ignore crop, do you get the full pixel count?

     

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    Hi Shane. If I tell it to ignore the crop I still get the same results, less pixel count on the export. The strange thing about this is not every image exports this way. some are fine but I did notice this on the crop pane. Some images read the full pixel count and some read less. The ones that read less also export at a smaller pixel count. Under "Original ratio", the Meta data file size reads 4016 x 6016 but here it's less. These are unedited files. no changes have been made after import.

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    After experimenting some, it appears that under lens corrections the "Distortion Control" is applying a crop to some of the images. If I reset this value to 0 instead of 100, and then go to the crop tool I can reset the image size to the full count. LR does not apply any crop to its lens corrections. I've never noticed this before. Not all images are affected by this even with the distortion control set to 100. so it appears somewhat random.

    0
  • Permanently deleted user

    Hi Ken

    Well, with 20/20 hindsight, that makes sense. Distortion control would involve a degree of cropping in much the same way that keystone correction also loses some pixels on the edges.

    As to why some images are affected and others not, it would depend on the nature of the lens. Varying focal lengths while using your 24 - 120 Nikkor (or any other variable focal length lens) would produce different degrees of distortion and hence, different interventions by C1. Conversely, I would assume that a prime would result in constant distortion and a single degree of "crop".

    It's your call, and you may prefer the approach made by Adobe in LR, but I prefer software which addresses distortion - especially as I can dial it back.

    All the best

     

    0
  • FirstName LastName

    I was frustrated by this exact issue! I have a few others but thats for another time.
    Thanks for starting this thread and helping solve/figure out this issue!

    0

投稿コメントは受け付けていません。