Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Removing purple and green fringing

Kommentare

13 Kommentare

  • Ian Wilson
    Moderator
    Top Commenter
    The analysis is for chromatic aberration. There is a slider slightly lower down in the tool to remove purple fringing. BUT... you need to look at the image at 100% to see what effect it is having. The preview may still look as though there is fringing.

    Ian
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    well, the slider is on 100 and still see green/purple edges without change around white shirts edges, tree branches etc..
    in LR, it was solved in 2 clicks... ☹️ too bad, that cant attach screenshot
    0
  • Ian Wilson
    Moderator
    Top Commenter
    [quote="NNN636372919529824193" wrote:
    well, the slider is on 100 and still see green/purple edges without change around white shirts edges, tree branches etc..
    in LR, it was solved in 2 clicks... ☹️ too bad, that cant attach screenshot

    And you've looked at 100%?

    Ian

    PS - to attach an image you need to put it online somewhere (like Flickr for instance) and put the URL of the image between Img tags.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    no need to zoom 😊 I can see it from default size 😊
    0
  • Ian Wilson
    Moderator
    Top Commenter
    [quote="NNN636372919529824193" wrote:
    no need to zoom 😊 I can see it from default size 😊

    Yes I know it’s visible at the default size. But as I tried to explain above, it will remain visible in the default size preview. You may only see the improvement from using the defringing control at 100%, because at 100% C1 will have to refer to the original raw file plus your adjustments. A similar quirk applies to things like noise reduction. And of course the correction will be incorporated into any JPG or TIFF output.

    Ian
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="Ian3" wrote:

    Yes I know it’s visible at the default size. But as I tried to explain above, it will remain visible in the default size preview. You may only see the improvement from using the defringing control at 100%, because at 100% C1 will have to refer to the original raw file plus your adjustments. A similar quirk applies to things like noise reduction. And of course the correction will be incorporated into any JPG or TIFF output.

    Ian


    Thanks Ian, good trick, I didn't realise that.
    0
  • SFA
    [quote="tenmangu81" wrote:
    [quote="Ian3" wrote:

    Yes I know it’s visible at the default size. But as I tried to explain above, it will remain visible in the default size preview. You may only see the improvement from using the defringing control at 100%, because at 100% C1 will have to refer to the original raw file plus your adjustments. A similar quirk applies to things like noise reduction. And of course the correction will be incorporated into any JPG or TIFF output.

    Ian


    Thanks Ian, good trick, I didn't realise that.


    That is true of many things - certain colours can also be rather sensitive to how one tries to compress them by pixel binning for smaller display areas such as preview files that are set to sizes intended to reduce file size and increase performance.

    Once you get down to very fine detail in an image there is every chance that there is simply not enough detail left to provide "normal" compression techniques with enough pixels to work effectively on a screen display.

    Printers can deal with it because they usually have their own rules for making colour decisions and detail decisions.
    0
  • Drugstore
    [quote="tenmangu81" wrote:
    [quote="Ian3" wrote:

    Yes I know it’s visible at the default size. But as I tried to explain above, it will remain visible in the default size preview. You may only see the improvement from using the defringing control at 100%, because at 100% C1 will have to refer to the original raw file plus your adjustments. A similar quirk applies to things like noise reduction. And of course the correction will be incorporated into any JPG or TIFF output.

    Ian


    Thanks Ian, good trick, I didn't realise that.


    It's not a bug, it's a feature 🤓
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="NN635299624516976000UL" wrote:
    [quote="tenmangu81" wrote:
    [quote="Ian3" wrote:

    Yes I know it’s visible at the default size. But as I tried to explain above, it will remain visible in the default size preview. You may only see the improvement from using the defringing control at 100%, because at 100% C1 will have to refer to the original raw file plus your adjustments. A similar quirk applies to things like noise reduction. And of course the correction will be incorporated into any JPG or TIFF output.

    Ian


    Thanks Ian, good trick, I didn't realise that.


    It's not a bug, it's a feature 🤓


    No, I didn't think nor say it was a bug !! I just didn't realise that !! And actually, I remember I have tried sometimes to suppress purple fringing without 100% zooming.... and thus with a mitigated result 🤭
    0
  • Jeffrey Jakucyk
    Capture One's purple fringing tool still isn't strong enough to really do the job though. I have a Nikkor 85mm f1.8 that fringes terribly if the focus isn't perfect and there's a bright object. Using the purple fringing slider only takes out about 1/3 of it. So I usually have to make a new layer to desaturate the specific color to make it go away completely.
    0
  • Willem Jan Drijfhout
    I second that, the purple defringing slider has very little effect. And that is strange, as defringing was always one of the strengths of C1. I remember from old versions (where I believe it was just an on-off check-box) that you could just leave it on by default and never had to worry about purple fringing. It was much better than Lightroom at that time.
    But it seems this has turned around. For this reason alone, I just downloaded Lightroom again, and although the 'generic' default is there not as good as in C1, pulling the slider out eliminates quickly 100% of the fringing, and not 30% like C1.
    Somehow along the line, this must have been a deliberate choice from PhaseOne to go for such a weak effect. What could have been the reason for that? And why introduce a slider if 100% of the slider only gives you 30% of the effect.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    It's always seemed like the purple fringing slider was really blurring the a and b channels in Lab, and it does seem less effective than years ago, but it also used to smear saturated colors in other parts of the image. For me, it was alway easier to do that in Ps anyway.
    0
  • SFA
    I have an old manual lens that in certain situations can produce extreme purple fringing.

    C1 will deal with it well most of the time but not always completely.

    One simple approach is to add a Colour Editor adjustment for the offending purple colour range and then save it as a Preset.

    You can then quickly "top up" the purple adjustment with the preset or, if that might adversely affect some required colours in the image, use it for an adjustment layer - either a general layer or one that makes use of a colour selection mask.

    How you choose to adjust the colour is, of course, up to you. The quick and easy option is desaturation but that may not always work exactly how you wish. But for a fast fix it usually offers some benefit.


    Grant
    0

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.