Why I am switching back to LR after 6 years...
To chime in with the others who are posted about it, here are my main gripes about CaptureOne, a software that I applaud for it's interface, I never encountered any serious bug, so it's not that...
Scenario is that my wife is a heavy photoshop user. I can get LR+PS for less than C1. But it's not just about the money buying Z9, Z8 and lenses easily dwarfs the cost of the software.
I am on a Mac Studio. Months ago (5?) I filed bugs about the bad performance of C1 on this kind of system. I come back from a shoot with 2000 images, and my machine imports this in C1. The machine is chilling, no CPU, no GPU. It takes nearly an hour. I do the same in LR - a factor > 10 faster. That's bad.
In C1 in the last year I got a lot of gimmicks as feature. In LR I get auto mask and denoise that are actually worth using.
My wife get's an Z8. Guess how well tethered shooting is working...
I can live with no auto mask (although seriously, that saves so much time). I can live with no good denoising (I have topaz denies for that). I can not really live with the shitty performance and the bugs in tethered shooting. That's the bread & butter of a pro app - be fast and reliable. C1 is not that anymore.
Then I start to investigate switching. And now I get really upset. I can go from LR to C1 easily. LR supports XMP files, all my edits are there, I just import that into C1. Not the other way round. C1 is a walled garden, a closed shop. Once you are in there, they don't want you to get out. That makes me a tiny bit mad.
Then there is the whole catalog vs session thing. When I switched so many years ago, it made perfect sense. But these days, LR can handle million of photos with no real slowdown. I imported (as a test) 60K photos into C1 and it took several hours (> 5). LR did the same in < 1h. And when using LR, it is fast and responsive, C1 is sluggish. That's on a very, very fast SSD. C1 support always tells you: you need the proper setup, fast etc. I am on a MacStudio. It does not get any faster on Macs. And it was the same on a AMD thread ripper with a 3090 Nvidia. The software is just build badly, with no real consideration to multiprocessor performance.
There is no roadmap on when performance get's addressed. Instead I get ton's of YT videos about the stupid iPad app. The focus is all wrong. I went to C1 years ago because I considered Adobe to the a money press that does not care about users, and C1 being a pro oriented choice. Times have changed, by now C1 feels like an app that is just trying to leech cash for little value.
Anyhow. I am not done evaluating the cost of moving 100k+ photos from C1 to LR. So I might stay, maybe I am too lazy. But, I really doubt it. The auto mask and the ability to have everything in just one catalog is winning me over.
Frank
-
-
Familiarity: Lightroom might have been the first photo editing software you used, and over the years, you have become comfortable and familiar with its interface and features. Returning to Lightroom could be driven by a desire to work with a tool you already know well.
-
Workflow Efficiency: Lightroom is known for its streamlined workflow and organization features. If you found that other software lacked certain capabilities or didn't integrate well with your existing workflow, you might choose to return to Lightroom for its efficiency.
-
Updates and Improvements: Lightroom, like any software, evolves with regular updates and improvements. If you were using other software during the six years, you might find that Lightroom has introduced new features and enhancements that appeal to you.
-
Integration with Adobe Ecosystem: Lightroom is part of the Adobe Creative Cloud ecosystem, and if you use other Adobe software like Photoshop, Illustrator, or Premiere Pro, returning to Lightroom 3d scan near me could provide a more seamless integration between these applications.
0 -
Post is closed for comments.
Comments
1 comment