Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

D810 sRaw

Permanently deleted user
Dear Community,
can anyone confirm the compatibility of CO10 with the sRaw files of a D810? According to the list of compatible cameras, it should - yet on my System it just displays the regular raw files and omits all sRaw.

Best
C
0

Comments

5 comments

Date Votes
  • Permanently deleted user
    Not sure about the sRAW, but the RAW files from the D810 are incredible in Capture One. Why sRAW? Timelapse or something?
    0
  • Grant Kernan
    Why SRaw?
    Seems only slightly better than jpeg.

    I don't mean to be judgemental, I am only curious.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="Canon_Shoe" wrote:
    Not sure about the sRAW, but the RAW files from the D810 are incredible in Capture One. Why sRAW? Timelapse or something?

    No doubt about that. But for family pics and such I do like the increased processing speed (at least in Lightroom) of the smaller raws. Not dramatic, but I think the advertisement is slightly misleading.

    In the »Whats new« Section for CO10 there's this paragraph
    Improved sRAW and mRAW Support
    Capture One’s full feature set for Lens Correction, Chromatic Aberration Analysis and LCC generation can now be used with most compressed formats from Canon and Nikon. See release notes for full table of support.


    Phase Support cleared that part up
    sRAW's are not supported from Nikon D8xx
    Main reason for this is that this is not a RAW file like it is on a Canon for example.
    Instead the Nikon sRAW is a JPG in a a NEF incapsulation.
    So for this reason we recommend you instead to use JPG if a smaller file sizes are desirable.


    Thanks for the replies 😄
    0
  • Keith Reeder
    [quote="Grant Kernan" wrote:
    Why SRaw?
    Seems only slightly better than jpeg.

    And that's not judgemental? Have you ever even tried sRaw?

    All the IQ capabilities of a full-sized Raw and a small file-size to boot? That might be the perfect recipe for someone who shoots high volumes but doesn't print wall-sized.
    0
  • SFA
    [quote="Keith Reeder" wrote:
    [quote="Grant Kernan" wrote:
    Why SRaw?
    Seems only slightly better than jpeg.

    And that's not judgemental? Have you ever even tried sRaw?

    All the IQ capabilities of a full-sized Raw and a small file-size to boot? That might be the perfect recipe for someone who shoots high volumes but doesn't print wall-sized.


    For Canon perhaps Keith.

    But apparently not for Nikon in that instance? (Based on the post above ...)


    Grant
    0

Post is closed for comments.