Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

C1 Mysteriously Changing File Sizes

Comments

4 comments

  • Wesley
    Anything checked in the lens correction tab (hide distorted area)? Were they all taken with same lens and focal length?
    0
  • Eric H
    They were all shot with the same lens and camera, but for some reason 2 of the 4 had distortion correction adjustments automatically applied. The ones that were output smaller were set to 100% distortion correction, the two that were output at their native resolution had distortion correction set to 0%.

    I didn't realize that Capture One actually crops your images down when correcting distortion (PS and LR do not). Also strange that when bringing in 4 brand new CR2 raw files, some automatically have distortion correction applied and some do not.
    0
  • Wesley
    Uncheck hide distorted area.

    I would also check noise reduction and put luminance to 0 and go up if necessary.

    Didn't like the auto applied default settings for NR and distortion so I "zeroed them out" than put it as new default.
    0
  • SFA
    [quote="Eric H" wrote:
    They were all shot with the same lens and camera, but for some reason 2 of the 4 had distortion correction adjustments automatically applied. The ones that were output smaller were set to 100% distortion correction, the two that were output at their native resolution had distortion correction set to 0%.

    I didn't realize that Capture One actually crops your images down when correcting distortion (PS and LR do not). Also strange that when bringing in 4 brand new CR2 raw files, some automatically have distortion correction applied and some do not.


    Probably focal length related. Did you check that?

    Bear in mind that lens correction implies messing with the pixels in some way. The result will likely be something that is not rectangular one way or another.

    On then has to decide whether to crop the image a little (or a lot) to use existing pixels only or create some extra pixels to give people the number of pixels they expected no matter what. Perhaps using some sort of "healing" algorithm? And hoping that the quality and content are acceptable.

    In some situations from some suppliers it may be that both approaches are employed.

    I think C1 developers have elected to leave out that part of the frame that probably would not have existed if the lens had not needed correction.

    Canon files, in my experience and comparing using the more obvious needs for adjustment presented by my S90 or G11, (not C1 supported but there are later versions that are likely close enough for comparison) tend to leave a little more distortion around the jpgs they produce in camera than C1 does with its interpretations. There's not much in it. In most cases I prefer the C1 result. Occasionally I may change it if significant subject matter is too close to the edge of a frame.

    It rarely matters as I am likely to crop the file anyway and if size is critical there is always an option to expand the result in the output process.

    HTH.


    Grant
    0

Post is closed for comments.