Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

CaptureOne 11 - Thanks!

NNN635158767546269381
Hello PhaseOne!

I would like to congratulate PhaseOne for CaptureOne v11. It works great here: Better performances, superb UI, great IQ, etc... And you can actually buy it! Do not change this!

Some complains about the price. From my side, 100€ for a major upgrade is "ok", nothing comes for free..

But you are not totally done yet. There are still some bugs. and it can be even more optimised. Go!

Somes suggestions:
- Better Fuji X-Trans support: OOC Jpeg are usually a little sharper as C1. C got way better colours.
- optimise DAM.
- "Exclude Duplicates" is very slow.
- While generating previews, C1 is very slow to display the current pictures. Priority issue ?
- Others MF camera support ?

Have a nice day.
Regards
0

Comments

6 comments

Date Votes
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="NNN635158767546269381" wrote:
    - "Exclude Duplicates" is very slow.

    yes, it is!

    but I wonder if it's only slow the first time around; i.e., C1 generates the hashes for the images in the catalog but doesn't have to re-generate them the second time. that would make it a lot faster.

    but... it's a only a feature I would need if I'm importing from an older location and I'm not sure if I had previously imported some of those images. eg, I have a folder on one of the disks called "Photos still to import", full of photos/images that I moved from other locations of my disks a long time ago.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="NNN635158767546269381" wrote:

    - Better Fuji X-Trans support: OOC Jpeg are usually a little sharper as C1. C got way better colours.

    I'm not sure what you mean there. My RAF files are oversharpened to hell and back by anything higher than version 10.0.2

    For ISO's higher than 400, rendering is unacceptable even with 0 sharpening.
    0
  • Christian Gruner
    Check your output recipe to see if output sharpening is enabled.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="Christian Gruner" wrote:
    Check your output recipe to see if output sharpening is enabled.

    Already been there 8 months ago... No big difference whether that's on or not.

    At this point I'm very certain it's a case of bad AA/MSAA or whatever algorithm you guys changed, that relates to pixel smoothing.

    There is way too big of a difference from one pixel value to another, and that drives the sharpening engine crazy at high ISOs.
    0
  • NNN635158767546269381
    While sharpening could be a lof of better on RAF file.. it's already good to my eyes..

    [quote="gusferlizi" wrote:
    [quote="NNN635158767546269381" wrote:

    - Better Fuji X-Trans support: OOC Jpeg are usually a little sharper as C1. C got way better colours.

    I'm not sure what you mean there. My RAF files are oversharpened to hell and back by anything higher than version 10.0.2

    For ISO's higher than 400, rendering is unacceptable even with 0 sharpening.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    [quote="NNN635158767546269381" wrote:
    While sharpening could be a lof of better on RAF file.. it's already good to my eyes..

    [quote="gusferlizi" wrote:
    [quote="NNN635158767546269381" wrote:

    - Better Fuji X-Trans support: OOC Jpeg are usually a little sharper as C1. C got way better colours.

    I'm not sure what you mean there. My RAF files are oversharpened to hell and back by anything higher than version 10.0.2

    For ISO's higher than 400, rendering is unacceptable even with 0 sharpening.


    I find the base rendering behind the curtains to be too sharp, making it impossible to pull back on a slider.
    0

Post is closed for comments.