Speed
I have been a long time user and I find 6 to be very slow.
I have just output 600 images and it took 2 hours.
That's more than 5 min per image.
Nikon D3 and D3s
Mac Pro
2x2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
8GB Ram
Nothing else running at the time.
Any one else with this issue.
Rob
I have just output 600 images and it took 2 hours.
That's more than 5 min per image.
Nikon D3 and D3s
Mac Pro
2x2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
8GB Ram
Nothing else running at the time.
Any one else with this issue.
Rob
0
-
Not noticed such a drop in speed as you as I never process more than a couple of images at a time but I too have noticed V6 is slower than previous versions of C1. The first (single) images I processed I instantly noticed this on my Mac Pro and also the same on my MPB. Its not a massive amount, maybe a couple of extra seconds but enough to notice it without actually timing with a watch. đ 0 -
v6 is working slower for me too. I'm not sure where the "Speed Improvements" that C1 is advertising are, but I'm not seeing them. 0 -
well its faster for me
and by the way 600 images 2 hours is 12 seconds per image
Derek0 -
If it's performance is lacking, try to turn OpenCL to "Never" in the preferences. It could be a compatibility issue with your Video Card. 0 -
[quote="Drew " wrote:
If it's performance is lacking, try to turn OpenCL to "Never" in the preferences. It could be a compatibility issue with your Video Card.
My Mac Pro video card is not supported (ATI 2600) so OpenCL is switched off and it is noticably slower processing images. Not much but it is slower. âšī¸0 -
I was wondering when we can expect support for additional video cards. My Nvidia GT 120 is not supported as yet.
Lanny0 -
[quote="Drew " wrote:
It could be a compatibility issue with your Video Card.
Is there a list for the compatible graphic cards?
(mine is a Radeon 4870).0 -
Supported OpenCL hardware on Mac (as of Dec 13, 2010, memory indicated is an important requirement)
AMD 5xxx 1GB
AMD 6xxx 1GB
AMD 4xxx 1GB
NVidia 88xx 1GB
NVidia Quadro 4800 1.5GB
NVidia 330M 512MB0
Post is closed for comments.
Comments
8 comments