Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Why are Auto and Auto so different?

Comments

4 comments

  • NN122830UL1
    Here is an image displaying error in v6.2 that I am referring to. The first image has had the levels adjusted by the "Auto" button in the Levels toolbox, itself....and the result is near enough...I have pasted the histogram for both images to show numerically what is going wrong although I cant see how this issue can be brushed under the carpet by attributing it to operating system, video card, insufficient ram, direction of wind, etc

    http://www.johnprendergastphotography.co.uk/Correct.jpg

    Here is the same image where the Levels were adjusted by using the "Auto" button that is on the top right of the main toolbar at the top of the interface. Only "Levels" have been enabled on this button and this may be useful if it actually worked. As you can see, Auto Levels performed this way has massacred the highlights....and makes the feature, useless

    http://www.johnprendergastphotography.co.uk/Wrecked.jpg

    When is the next update and will it address this error in the program?
    0
  • John7
    Thanks, I find that you're right. I noticed with 6 that I couldn't depend on the master "Auto" button to give me a decent starting point for corrections any more. So many of the highlights were so blown out that the adjustment was unusable. I would think that the master auto level should do the same thing as on the individual auto levels box. They are certainly different. I hope this is something they will soon fix, I use to depend on the master auto most of the time to give me a good starting point. Also, it would be nice to have the ability to set the default "Saturation" before doing a global auto correction. Just a default 5 for any type of file does not make sense to me. On some shoots I would like a global +15 on auto rather than having to do this on another step.

    JOHN
    0
  • NN122830UL1
    There are a great deal of bugs and errors being reported on this forum about the program that are "right" but are, for some unfathomable reason???????, being brushed under the carpet by way of attributing (mistakenly) to user error, Operating System, system spec, dodgy Ram or which way the wind is blowing..........

    PhaseOne should be doing better than this for its customers and should not be dumping errors on its customer base to iron out by beta testing (which I certainly never enrolled on)
    0
  • Jim MSP
    [quote="NN122830UL1" wrote:
    Here is an image displaying error in v6.2 that I am referring to. The first image has had the levels adjusted by the "Auto" button in the Levels toolbox, itself....and the result is near enough...I have pasted the histogram for both images to show numerically what is going wrong although I cant see how this issue can be brushed under the carpet by attributing it to operating system, video card, insufficient ram, direction of wind, etc


    Here is the same image where the Levels were adjusted by using the "Auto" button that is on the top right of the main toolbar at the top of the interface. Only "Levels" have been enabled on this button and this may be useful if it actually worked. As you can see, Auto Levels performed this way has massacred the highlights....and makes the feature, useless



    When is the next update and will it address this error in the program?


    Thanks for pointing this out. It explains some of the weird results I have seen.

    Please open a support case with your excellent example; they really need to log this and fix it soon.

    I am like a lot of folks. I often use the global "Auto" as a starting point.
    0

Post is closed for comments.