Support for Canon 5D Mark IV??
When might we expect an update in C1 ver 9.x to support the new Canon 5D Mark IV dSLR body?
0
-
You'll know when it happens - Phase One never pre-announces support or provides roadmaps. 0 -
It would be nice to know at least which quarter they are shooting for since I can no longer use C1 Pro until they support my camera. 🤓 0 -
According to DPReview and several other sites, ver 9.3 has been released (although I cannot find it as an update to 9.2 YET) and of the various new camera models listed, is the 5DIV -- YEA!!! 0 -
Mike,
You don't have to wait for the servers to catch up with the "Update check" facility.
If you want it just go into the site and download it.
If you have registered for the Newsletter you probably should have received an email to tell you about the new release earlier today.
And there have been a number of mentions in the forums too. Plus of course a post or two from last week mentioning the possibility of something of interest in what was then the current Beta candidate, now the released product.
The 5D4 files look great to my eyes based on the RAW files downloaded from dpreview. I wish I could justify the need to buy one ..... working on it. May need the new lenses as well.
Grant0 -
Got 9.3 as suggested - looking forward to processing raw files in a couple of days - stepping up from a Mark II to the Mark IV should produce interesting results - am a BIG fan of C1Pro. 0 -
Hi Mike,
may I ask if you have successfully processed RAW files from the 5D MK4. I just tried a customer's RAW files (for a support case) and I wasn't able to import them with success. Maybe they have been shot in dual pixel raw mode.
Thanks,
Gerrit0 -
Gerrit,
You could be right about the Dual Pixel issue.
Does any software except Canon DPP support the dual pixel option yet?
FWIW I don not have a 5D4 but I did download some RAW file (from DPREVIEW) and they processed very well indeed using C1 9.3.
HTH.
Grant0 -
CO is able to import, adjust (with CO adjustments) and process the Dual Pixel raws. If you are not able to do this, please create a Support case, so we can take a deeper look. 0 -
Interesting Christian, I'm impressed.
My apologies for assuming this would not be possible.
Presumably the processing capability does not include the focus adjustment actions claimed for DPP?
Grant0 -
The release notes and current camera support state that Dual-Pixel RAW are NOT supported. Dual-Pixel is used for micro focus adjustments.
https://www.phaseone.com/en/Products/So ... meras.aspx0 -
[quote="AiDon" wrote:
The release notes and current camera support state that Dual-Pixel RAW are NOT supported. Dual-Pixel is used for micro focus adjustments.
https://www.phaseone.com/en/Products/So ... meras.aspx
It does not say that the raw is not supported. It is formulated in that way to indicate that AF correction aspect is not supported, but the files themselves are indeed supported.0 -
[quote="Christian Gruner" wrote:
[quote="AiDon" wrote:
The release notes and current camera support state that Dual-Pixel RAW are NOT supported. Dual-Pixel is used for micro focus adjustments.
https://www.phaseone.com/en/Products/So ... meras.aspx
It does not say that the raw is not supported. It is formulated in that way to indicate that AF correction aspect is not supported, but the files themselves are indeed supported.
My apologies Christian but I did state that the Micro-Focus are not supported, although probably not as clear as it could be.0 -
Hi,
what about this
http://www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/canon ... -are-there
will C1 support this ability to get additional stop from highligts in dual-pixel raws?0 -
[quote="AT75" wrote:
Hi,
what about this
http://www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/canon ... -are-there
will C1 support this ability to get additional stop from highligts in dual-pixel raws?
I have forwarded the link to the right persons, but a quick look using the same raw file, and it seems that CO already can recover just as much of the sky as in their best-case example.0 -
[quote="AT75" wrote:
Hi,
what about this
http://www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/canon ... -are-there
will C1 support this ability to get additional stop from highligts in dual-pixel raws?
Interesting. They state:[quote="rawdigger.com" wrote:
...
suppose, neighboring A and B sub-pixels have a value of 8,000; ...
...
there is about a 2x (a stop) difference between the value 8192 in the A / B pixel sets
...
But with the same light on both of the dual pixels of a set and a factor 2 difference between the pixels in a set, it should be
'... neighboring A and B sub-pixels have a value of 4,000 and 8,000; ...'.
A pretty good way to confuse people.[quote="rawdigger.com" wrote:
...
A Canon 5D Mark IV sensor contains two sets of pixels, A and B. Charge stored in pixels of each set is converted into a 14-bit value.
...
there is about a 2x (a stop) difference between the value 8192 in the A / B pixel sets
...
the main subframe containing sums of the values from the "A" and "B" pixel sets
...
The simple sum doesn't make sense to me.
8192 + 16384 = 24576. Simply adding them, one is clipping at 10922 and the other at 5461, for a 14 bit into 14 bit result.
And, even worse, with the bright pixel capturing a 50% brightness correctly as 8192, the sum would make it 8192 + 4096 = 12288, a 75% brightness.
I expect that combined(A,B) = ( 2*A + B ) / 2, or similar. Possibly way more sophisticated.
In the end I understood that the subframes can be used to create a 2-image HDR stack for highlight recovery.
But maybe I just didn't understand the article at all.
Regards,
Hans0 -
Will C1 finally support the benefits of dual-pixel raw? Already some individuals made this, why no support from C1?
https://www.dpreview.com/news/086869866 ... -raw-files0
Post is closed for comments.
Comments
17 comments