Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Should a DNG look exactly the same as the parent RAW?

Comments

4 comments

  • RobiWan
    [quote="Geezerhood" wrote:

    Should a DNG look exactly the same as the parent RAW?


    It was your question - The answer is No, because you have converted the RAW first time with Adobe DNG Converter. Adobe has DNG version 1.4 (I mean), C1 can only read version 1.2. The first time converted with Adobe DNG Converter, the next time with C1

    DNG Converted File should look exactly the same as the parent RAW only if you are using a new Adobe Software like Adobe Camera RAW (Version 8+) or Adobe Lightroom (Version 5+)

    [quote="Geezerhood" wrote:

    Does C1Pro handle DNG files in the same way as RAW files?


    No and yes - Yes - If the Camera produced DNG File is this your RAW (like some Laica Cameras). No if this is a Adobe DNG converted File. This is no more your originally RAW file.
    0
  • Geezerhood
    Thanks for the reply. I think will stick to converting /exporting to DNG in Capture One when needed, as that seems to give me the closest conversion to what I am seeing in the original RAW file.
    0
  • Ron Alexander
    I have never figured out what the value of a DNG file is. Yes, Adobe does always seem to be first off the mark to support new camera RAW files, and at times one could be forced to do the double step conversion to DNG, using the latest Adobe converter, and then open the file in the software you really want to use.

    However, contrary to what Scott Kelby recommends in his books, I don't see the value of building DNG conversion into your workflow. Always, Always keep your original RAW files!
    0
  • RobiWan
    [quote="Ron AKA" wrote:

    However, contrary to what Scott Kelby recommends in his books, I don't see the value of building DNG conversion into your workflow. Always, Always keep your original RAW files!


    +1
    0

Post is closed for comments.