Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Request for stacked or grouped images

Comments

2 comments

  • Manara
    Absolutely!

    I added this request to the Capture One 12 wish list in the Windows section:

    viewtopic.php?f=72&t=27931#p133605
    0
  • Eric Valk
    I agree this a very important feature and it is one I rellay miss since leaving Aperture.

    I can duplicate most of this feature with some Applescripts.

    I have already got an Applescript that automatically groups images by date and image format.

    These 4 properties are inaccessible to those of us without PhaseOne cameras:
    • Sequence ID: Unique identifier (i.e., IQ back serial number and initial frame number of each sequence).

    • Sequence Type: Tool in use (e.g Hyperfocal, HDR, Focus, Time lapse).

    • Sequence Count: frame count shown as position (e.g., position 3 (of 7 ).

    • Sequence Total:frame count shown as total (e.g sequences comprising of 7 images).


    However we can pick 4 other user configurable metatadata fields to substitute; I'm thinking the IPTC Contact group.The the following mapping:
    • Sequence ID <--> Country

    • Sequence Type: <--> Phone

    • Sequence Count: <--> Email

    • Sequence Total: <--> Website

    • Sequence Pick (True/False) --> Postal code


    An Applescript Autosorter will be able to populate these fields automatically for an entire project. Groups names will come from the sequence numbers at the end of the first and last image names, and the project name.
    Then Filters Tool can be used to view any particular Stack, or view only the stack picks.

    Then a little Applescript to set the stack pick, and another to create an album for each group and copy all the group members to the Group Album.

    If PhaseOne eventually let's regular users use the sequence fields, then it's easy enough to write an Applescript to move the information from the mapped fields to the sequence fields.

    Question for the crowd: Are these tthee best "Unused Metadata Fields" to hijack, if I were to share this? Or are there other less used fields, like Getty images?
    0

Post is closed for comments.