Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

CO 6.1.1 does not use the option "Embedded Camera profile"?

Comments

9 comments

  • Michael Mährlein
    ... now I reseted the image and it works again! ❓

    Does anybody makes the same observation?

    Best regards, Michael
    0
  • Paul Steunebrink
    In case of any doubt, delete your process recipe and create a new one from scratch.
    0
  • Michael Mährlein
    I think that is the problem. Thanks for your tip.
    0
  • Michael Mährlein
    Now I found the problem ... and the solution.
    If I use an additional layer and export the the file with embedded camera profile, CO attached the sRGB profile. If I switch off all additional layers and export, the correct icc profile is embedded. Grrrrr -> therefore the "new" function "layers" are not useable.
    Can somebody test this problem on his machine?
    Best regards, Michael
    0
  • Paul Steunebrink
    Can't reproduce the error. Always embeds camera profile.

    P40+ image, CO Pro 6.1.1, 1 local adj. layer, tiff 8- or 16-bit, embed camera profile, open with CS5, OS X 10.5.8.
    0
  • Michael Mährlein
    Thanks for testing! Now I deleted the receipt and I have made a new one. The result is the same. If I switch off the layer the camera profile is embedded, if I switch it on the profile is not embedded.
    Now I opened a support case.
    Best regards, Michael
    0
  • thowi
    yes, it happens when you add a layer with color edits.
    It's not a bug and it is there since layers were introduced.
    Color edits in the color editor physically alter the camera profile. So you have one camera profile on the background layer and another camera profile on the upper layer ... and there is no way to merge the two profiles into one.
    If you want to use color edits on layers you have to set a different color profile as output recipe (ProPhotoRGB or whatever you prefer).
    0
  • Paul Steunebrink
    Makes sense, thanks for explaining.
    0
  • Michael Mährlein
    Thanks for explantation. The support confirmed it.
    Best regards, Michael
    0

Post is closed for comments.