Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Re-trying version 4, still not happy with it.

Comments

7 comments

  • Permanently deleted user
    Thats exactly what a lot of users ask for!
    I don't see any advantages in the changes they made.
    3.x was a very fast professional workflow. Can someone (Phase One or users) explain what the advantages of theese changes are? For me it seems very complicated now and makes alot of work.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Hi List, I completely agree with Bud1's comments, my biggest gripe is the silly little process wheel which is such a pain, at the end of a busy day's shooting it would be so helpful to glance quickly at the thumbs and check processed images, its not even possible to sort by processed state !!, I have been forced as a work-around to tag the processed images with a green marker so I can see easier which shots were processed..
    I'm not going to hold my breath on this request as I and other users have been asking for the process marker to be bigger or clearer for months now..
    Andy Cahill
    0
  • kitty
    [quote="wilfried " wrote:
    Thats exactly what a lot of users ask for!
    I don't see any advantages in the changes they made.
    3.x was a very fast professional workflow. Can someone (Phase One or users) explain what the advantages of theese changes are? For me it seems very complicated now and makes alot of work.


    Agree that workflow on v.4 is different and need some changes.
    But files developed from v.4 is much better than v.3 eg. noise, smoother graduate tone, sharpness.
    No more rough texture skin, no more halo around high contrast edge.
    And it is very stable and fast now. Good job phaseone!

    kitty
    0
  • Robert Frith
    [quote="kitty " wrote:

    And it is very stable and fast now.
    kitty

    News to me. Stable is one thing it most definitely ain't!
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    I have to agree with Kitty I use Phase v4 all day every day and its very stable and fast.
    I don't want to start a war, I never dare to post on the Adobe Photoshop forums as you get a virtual kicking if you put a step wrong !! and this forum always seems more friendly..
    I would love Phase to implement the very good suggestions from users like myself who use the software every day and just want a few refinements but on the 3 machines that I use the software I don't experience any issues at all.
    Cheers Andy
    0
  • kitty
    [quote="Robert71" wrote:
    [quote="kitty " wrote:

    And it is very stable and fast now.
    kitty

    News to me. Stable is one thing it most definitely ain't!


    v.4 earlier is not stable. From v.4.7 upward is better.
    4.8 is solid rock. I develop hundred of pictures everyday.
    No problem at all.

    Kitti
    0
  • Bud1
    Whether v4 is stable or not stable and if the processed images are better than in v3 is not what my complaints are about. I have no problem with stability in v3.7.9 and image quality is also not an issue. With v4 it's about the work flow. When working with several thousand images in a session you can't beat v3.7.9. It's unfortunately the reason I'm not upgrading my cameras, because then I'll be forced to use something other than v3.
    0

Post is closed for comments.