A few general question regarding C1Pro 9 workflow

Permanently deleted user

• December 11, 2015 00:20

Hi!

I recently switched to C1pro and I'm eager to get it optimised for my workflow. I love sessions and the tethering support with capture pilot! The procession function is head and shoulders over LR!

1. Is there any benefit of using Photo Mechanic 5 together with C1pro 9, or does c1pro do everything PM5 does and render it obsolete ?

2.Roundtrip to Photoshop, could anyone share a link to article/video how to do this as effective as possible ?

Thanx!

0

• 

  BenjaminJ

  • December 11, 2015 01:19

  Cant answer the 1st question, don't use photomechanic.
  
  As to the 2nd question, its really simple one you see how.
  http://blog.phaseone.com/quick-round-trip-photoshop/

  0
• 

  Anders Tollestrup

  • December 11, 2015 10:20

  In Capture One 8 Pro, I used both Photomechanic 5 and Capture One 8 together and it works like a charm woth XMP integration (requires full XMP sync). My main reason for using Photomechanic was the lack of good keyword handling in Capture One 8 and better support for file renaming in Photomachanic.
  
  In Capture One 9 we got the Keyword Library, which is a very good solution, so my need for Photomechanic is now obsolete (and since the full XMP sync is broken in the current version of Capture One 9). But I would still love Capture One to support all EXIF/IPTC fields in the file renaming tool. I'm missing the Frame4 field, which hold the original last 4 digits of the camera filename.
  
  Speed wise, Capture One is just as fast as Photomechanic in the culling process.
  
  Just my 5¢
  
  /Anders

  0
• 

  Permanently deleted user

  • December 11, 2015 11:45

  Benjamin:
  Thank you for that link, seems pretty straightforward.
  
  Anders:
  
  Thank you, was exactly what i was looking for.

  0

Post is closed for comments.