Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Comments

18 comments

Date Votes
  • Daniel Schulz
    I second that question.

    For now i only can see that the main difference is that capture one is trying to make us archive our shoots with the software.
    But that is not really how most people work i suppose with this software apart from some.
    Once images are captured and exported the shoot is normally not anymore touched over capture one.
    0
  • LadyRainbows
    There are some huge improvements. You should download the trial version and see for yourself.
    Here are some of the really obvious improvements (at least for me)
    The highlight and shadow recovery tools are vastly improved.
    The new clarity tool(s) are a huge improvement for landscape photos.
    B&W tool is improved, no more blotching with the blue slider. Same with the lightness tool in the color editor.
    Auto lens correction.
    And so much more.
    0
  • NNN634439311409249401
    This version has a whole new and improved rendering engine. That in itself should tempt you to try the free trial.
    0
  • Coach
    I can finally move my crops that butt up to the edges (see ). Now where is the Red Eye removal feature?
    0
  • Daniel Schulz
    [quote="Coach" wrote:
    I can finally move my crops that butt up to the edges (see ). Now where is the Red Eye removal feature?


    In photoshop 😊
    Capture one should stay a good capture tool and do not use its superior stand for that by trying to get a new horse-rabbit-donkey-cat-dog mix.
    0
  • Coach
    Your response has been said many times over, yet for some reason not many have stayed with version 1.0. For my workflow, primarily sports photography, a red eye feature would eliminate needing to use an extra program for the vast majority of my images. Also, if I have to reprocess the raw again, I don't have to re-edit what I had already fixed once. That's why I was glad when they introduced the spot/dust feature.
    0
  • Daniel Schulz
    [quote="Coach" wrote:
    Your response has been said many times over, yet for some reason not many have stayed with version 1.0. For my workflow, primarily sports photography, a red eye feature would eliminate needing to use an extra program for the vast majority of my images. Also, if I have to reprocess the raw again, I don't have to re-edit what I had already fixed once. That's why I was glad when they introduced the spot/dust feature.


    Sounds legit.
    For us every images goes trough photoshop - no discussion. And final tiffs are archived as the psd's and tiffs with layer.
    So i guess for your demands things like that are handy.
    Capture one 3 btw is the first real capture version - before it was called portrait one. Apart from that no actual camera would work on portrait 1 or even on our all beloved capture one 3 - even so i would not go back as c1pro is now really much better of course. Barely anybody did use digital cameras - the needs where a different world also.
    0
  • Steven48
    [quote="Coach" wrote:
    I can finally move my crops that butt up to the edges (see ). Now where is the Red Eye removal feature?

    I saw a tutorial the other day on vimio on removing red eye in C1 6 and the photographer used the local adjustment brush to select the eye(s) then selected the red with the color selection eye dropper and removed the saturation and adjust as necessary. Seemed to work rather well, it was quick and it would eliminate having to use a secondary piece of software.
    0
  • Coach
    Yes, local adjustments will work, but not as easily as a built in feature like the spot remover. I would like to see the video to find out how to do it "quick."
    0
  • Steven48
    [quote="Coach" wrote:
    Yes, local adjustments will work, but not as easily as a built in feature like the spot remover. I would like to see the video to find out how to do it "quick."

    Here is the link, its in French I believe.
    http://vimeo.com/25138743
    0
  • Coach
    Thanks for the link. My French is limited to fries and toast, but I got the gist of it. I've avoided using adjustments because the .comask files mess with my third party renaming tool, but you have piqued my interest in using it some more. Thanks.
    0
  • Steven48
    I'm with you in the speaking of French. Like you I got the idea. Like you said before, not as fast as a dedicated tool, but it looks to work. I think after you've done it a time or two, 20 seconds and its done.
    0
  • LadyRainbows
    I just have to ask.
    Why are you guys still using on axis light/flash for your photography?
    0
  • Steven48
    [quote="ben43456" wrote:
    I just have to ask.
    Why are you guys still using on axis light/flash for your photography?

    I don't. But as a photo editor, you need to know how to fix problems when they arise. Wouldn't you agree? 😊
    0
  • Coach
    Like I said, sports photography, so off camera flash on big football/soccer fields are not really practical. I prefer not to use flash, but it does give more pop in many situations and is really helpful, especially in poorly lit high school endzones.
    0
  • Gene Stryjewski
    Can I download the trail for 7 and keep my working version of 6xx?

    Thanks, Gene
    0
  • Coach
    I have the trial running and v6 still working, so yes.
    0
  • Paul Steunebrink
    [quote="digitalgene" wrote:
    Can I download the trail for 7 and keep my working version of 6xx?

    Thanks, Gene

    Yes, you can rename the CO6 app folder and install CO7 next to it. Or place them in separate folders. They each have distinct preference files, so that is ok too.
    0

Post is closed for comments.