Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

LOCAL ADJ. SHARPENING FILTER RADIUS(TRESHOLD)

Comments

6 comments

  • Drew Altdo
    Patience Dean.
    We'll have an update soon.
    0
  • Dean26
    Thank you....D 😊
    0
  • Dean26
    Hope gone again , 7.1.4 is here but nothing new again.It's not about patience ,it's about care and support expected from "High End" company (hardware and software),hard to belief that software eng. team cannot solve this issue, they can make
    jump from 230Mb package to 180Mb (don't see why that matters) but important "Bug" stay and stay.
    I'm opening this topic because got feeling that nobody care and question is do software people forgot this or other things
    are more important.I see many strange issues people have,many are from not enough knowledge but this is essential
    tool(local sharpening radius,threshold),if work on Mac mean should work here as well (more than year old problem??).
    Disappointing,let's buy Mac-sorry,tired of disappointing.Imagine that I buy your medium format back,lenses -probably
    would blow about this,but?!-yes ,than I would buy Mac also.It's careless I think,nothing else-now let's forget about it and
    just adopted workflow to what we get for the buck.

    More care about Win users
    wish you D
    0
  • Dean26
    Just want to add finishing touch as I see other people look at this topic so I would like to clear my opinion about C1v7.
    Until V7 C1 was one of the best RAW converters with image quality at top priority ,overall image quality , but after introducing v7 it become BEST.To explain this I shall say that I use ACR together with Photoshop(great way to multi passes
    raw conversion using Smart Objects),Photo Ninja-nice , but in C1 v7 new way to handle definition(signal to noise) problem
    ,removing noise and preserving details even in deep shadows do not leave any doubt about quality which this software deliver.Also output can be adjusted for any output color space(not only sRGB,AdobeRGB and ProPhoto) and upsizing engine
    is better(by my opinion) from many expensive third party tools.
    Way of work is thing of learninig and adopting,image quality is target of all our efforts , so...
    Still , some bugs should be solved faster,to be fair it seems that Windows are become more and more harder to work with
    with every new release(now using Win7 64bit Ult.).
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Hi Dean,

    I understand that you're waiting for the addition of the threshold parameter for sharpening in Local Adjustments. But just out of curiosity did you already experiment with the Clarity function in the Punch mode and adjusting the Structure by some positive value how this will affect the micro contrast and the detail rendition in you images? This function is completely avaliable for Local Adjustments / Layers. Depending on your subject I think this may be an option for tweaking the subjective impression of sharpness / detail rendition - perhaps with some advantages over the tradicional sharpening or complementing it.
    0
  • Dean26
    Hi,

    yes I use exactly that way to compensate mostly radius , by default I like to leave radius at 1 and lower sharp. amount
    but would like to add sharpening with different radius for clouds and lower for stone texture for example,for now ,of course,
    I use structure for texture things and clarity for bigger radius local contrast.In many cases would not like to apply any overall sharpening(spoiled natural lens blur in some cases).
    Yes ,thank you ,but already working and it's good in most cases but would like to get all tools which I paid for-it's just long
    waiting for bug solution,want to remind guys for that,that's all.
    When I wrote about this (not in forum but to support team) they didn't know about it because they use Mac-s, than one
    certified instructor react and confirm bug(said it was from v6) , mean need to remind them from time to time,or never
    going to solve it.
    I would enjoy to have Noise red. in Loc.Adj. also but for that purpose I also use negative values of Structure tool.
    So, don't worry I 'm making satisfied results with available tools , just no bugy version would be better.

    Have a nice day Michael D
    0

Post is closed for comments.