Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Worse than the first release of v6 ?? Sooo slow

Comments

2 comments

  • NN159009UL4
    I have purchased all versions of CO from 5 to 7 and have found them deficient for reasons already stated in this and other forums. For those interested in saving themselves the aggravation of dealing with this software may I suggest a try at my workflow with IIQ files from an IQ 160 and CR2 files from an EOS 5 III:
    • Profile camera using 24 patch ColorChecker Chart and Adobe DNG Profile Editor
    • Convert IIQ and CR2 files to DNG using Adobe DNG converter rather than CO, including v7.0
    • Open in Camera Raw, apply profile and adjustments. Open in Photoshop or LR.
    • Cataloguing and housekeeping with PhotoMechanic
    I believe that you will find the tools and output in CR far superior if you profile the camera or back. Without an adequate profile the output from PS will actually fall far behind CO. Of course, tethering is a completely different issue but I still utilize CO for a Phase One DF 645 and DSLR Pro from Breeze Systems for the Canon.
    On a related note, the DNG Flat Field Plug-in for Lightroom 4.2 does a fantastic job for LCC including color correction and light fall off.
    0
  • John2
    Thanks for the outline of your workflow, it's not for me I'm afraid.

    I LOVE the (relative to your workflow) one-stop C1 v6.4.4 and what it does with my raw files, and I suspect that v7 has some very cool tricks up its sleeve, I'm just grumbling that it is currently desperately slow dealing with my Nikon files (and won't allow me more than 100 spot corrections on a file - a small issue in the scheme of things)

    PhaseOne will fix the problem, as they have done with previous releases, I'm just impatient.

    Hint. Hint.
    0

Post is closed for comments.