Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Workspace detail

Permanently deleted user

What I would really like, is instead of the file name taking centre space at the bottom of the viewer and the exposure details on the bottom left ... please reverse them !!

When I'm editing a couple of hundred images in a project the file name is irrelevant, I have already made the selections, but to see the different exposure details helps me make quick adjustment decisions from image to image. Also, do we really need the erase card after import tick box, that is an accident waiting to happen. Thanks 

0

Comments

2 comments

Date Votes
  • Permanently deleted user

    Hi Simon,

    This is a user-to-user forum. I would suggest you to submit a request (top right corner of this page).
    Cheers.

    0
  • SFA

    In addition to Robert's suggestion might I suggest that you consider a slightly different proposal.

    In many cases, and especially when the previews are scaled when showing in multi-image mode, the details may not all be visible anyway. There is not enough space under images when reduced in size.

    This is especially evident if people are using long image names.

    If one reverses the order of display and then truncates the size of the preview some information will often be eliminated.

    It would probably make more sense, if proposing to change the current "standard", to allow users to define the contents of the "primary display area" in order to allow people to pick which bits of information they would like to keep available when truncation is required.

     

    That said, I don't personally have any issues with how it works now and this suggestion is not one I can recall seeing previously in the forum.

    I agree with your comment about the erase after import tick box but the default is an unticked box and there are people who choose a workflow that would include automatically deleting from the import location. There are situation where I might actually want to use such a facility knowing that I have backups anyway, though fortunately, in my approach, I have never used it. 

    There are some cases historically, where perhaps it would have been better if I had. One can have too many backup copies scattered over a collection of drives  - given enough time to accumulate them.

    0

Post is closed for comments.