Jim Sullivan
- Total activity 17
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 2
- Subscriptions 2
Comments
Recent activity by Jim Sullivan-
SFA, Never used the EF version, but I have used the EF 100-400 II L and EF 70-300 L – great lenses, but like all zooms, they have compromises with distortion. Most shots it's not apparent, but if y...
-
To all (since similar things are being said), As far as I know, Canon does not embed lens correction profiles in their RAW file. Some lenses like the RF 24-240 are nearly unusable without one (at l...
-
Also find it curious that combative, self-righteous posters like SFA/BeO do not use their real names, while many of us asking for profile support do.
-
Thanks, Shane. Since a setting of 100 is a full correction for distortion and light falloff, I assumed 100 is full correction for sharpness and not overcorrection. Not really an issue as the amount...
-
It does apply it more in the corners, but you can still see mild sharpening being applied in the center by the time the slider reaches 100.
-
Thank you, Lily! :)
-
^ That supports my original frustration, which is these RF lenses have been available for retail sale for six months (RF 70-200) to a year in some cases (RF 85). Sounds like then it truly is a reso...
-
^ It sounds like in cases where there is no embedded profiles, the LR team may get a prototype of the lens and create their own profile in advance. Perhaps they have a system set up to photograph t...
-
And just as a general thought, lens profiles aren't really "features" in the same sense as most of the requests here. And they really don't fall under "technical support", either. Getting visibilit...
-
Abuse, lol! Who made you the C1 hurt feelings guardian? It’s not my job as a license holder to do the work for them. Lens profiles of common, popular lenses is a basic requirement for image process...