メインコンテンツへスキップ

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

Where did subname go?

コメント

2件のコメント

  • Calvin Powers

    Oh wait, now I get it. The entire naming scheme is now part of the recipe definition. This actually makes a lot more sense and is easier to manage. Just took me a few minutes to figure it out. 

    0
  • Class A

    @Calvin Powers

    How do manually achieve influencing the output location on a per-export basis across all profiles?

    As far as I can see this is no longer possible.

    I'd like to be able to use a common root for all recipes, e.g., "C:\Exports\".
    This is supported.

    I'd like to be able to generate the output of different recipes to different output subfolders, e.g. "C:\Exports\...\JPEGs\" vs "C:\Exports\...\TIFFs\".
    This is also supported (via a respective token).

    I'd like to be able to influence the "..." part in the above paths on a per-export basis, e.g., "C:\Exports\ClientA\JPEGs\" vs "C:\Exports\ClientA\TIFFs\", by entering "ClientA" into a text field in the GUI.
    This does not seem to be supported anymore.

    If "ClientA" appears as a name (e.g., album name) that can be referenced via a token, then the desired outcome is still achievable (via the use of a respective token), but often I want to use different names in my output structure.

    Do you see any way what I want is still achievable?

    If not and you'd wish you could do something like the above, perhaps support my respective feature request.

    0

投稿コメントは受け付けていません。