Older NEF files not sharp in CO, but are in NX-D
I am running Windows 7 and CO Pro 7.2.2. I just downloaded NX-D out of curiosity.
Today I docked a drive from 2008-09 with sports action. I tried to look at them in CO and they were really blurry. The thumbnails are small, but look sharp. I shot those files with a Nikon D3.
I then looked at the very same files in NX-D and they are sharp as a tack.
I'm at a complete loss to explain the problem and don't have a clue how to deal with the files in CO.
Vaughn
Today I docked a drive from 2008-09 with sports action. I tried to look at them in CO and they were really blurry. The thumbnails are small, but look sharp. I shot those files with a Nikon D3.
I then looked at the very same files in NX-D and they are sharp as a tack.
I'm at a complete loss to explain the problem and don't have a clue how to deal with the files in CO.
Vaughn
0
-
I should have mentioned that current shots are sharp. 0 -
The Nikon software will be applying an in-house "recipe" - including sharpening - that Capture One won't/can't replicate by default.
But how the images look in software doesn't matter - it's the output that tells the real story, and I'll bet that a suitably-tweaked Capture One conversion will match or beat the Nikon software's conversion in sharpness terms.
Edit; Or are you saying that the images are so blurry as presented in Capture One that they're effectively unworkable?
I recall that there have been other posts making similar observations.
Screen shot, please?0 -
They are so blurry as to be marginal to unworkable.
The puzzle is that I was using CO I believe back then just an earlier version and they were fine.
I don't doubt that CO is better than Nikon software. I will say that on contemporary files, the ND-X thumbnail is sharper and the image I work on seems sharper also. Don't worry though, 'case I am a believer in CO.
Vaughn0 -
Vaughn,
You may not be viewing what you think you are viewing.
For example, could you be previewing an old lower resolution preview file on a higher resolution system?
I don't know - just wondering what the differences by be attributed to.
Grant.0 -
While the monitor is newer, the overall system is much the same. The point is that I am viewing the very same NEF file using two different software packages. CO and NX-D are converting the same NEF file. So I don't think older resolution is even in play at this point.
It seems as though I should be able to revisit old files and using CO 7 make good files now.
Vaughn0 -
[quote="Vaughn" wrote:
While the monitor is newer, the overall system is much the same. The point is that I am viewing the very same NEF file using two different software packages. CO and NX-D are converting the same NEF file. So I don't think older resolution is even in play at this point.
It seems as though I should be able to revisit old files and using CO 7 make good files now.
Vaughn
I agree.
I can't comment on NEF as I use Canon (mainly) but I can't imagine why there should be any difference in the processing of old files. You are opening them, right? Not just previewing?
I may have some old NEF files somewhere, although perhaps not any I have previously edited with earlier version of C1. If I find them I will check to see what happens.
Grant0 -
I know it's no consolation but I just opened D1H, D2Hs and D40 NEFs in latest version Capture One Pro and they were all pin sharp. Windows 8.1 by the way. 0
Post is closed for comments.
Comments
7 comments