Skip to main content

⚠️ Please note that this topic or post has been archived. The information contained here may no longer be accurate or up-to-date. ⚠️

OpenCL & Fujifulm X-Trans.

TERRY LEUNG
Hi everyone.

In the release notes of v11.x , it says OpenCL supports Fujifulm X-Trans.

However, on the Knowledge Base of the official website, it says NO under the section of "Limitation in functionality".



Anyone knows which one is correct? Thanks!
0

Comments

6 comments

Date Votes
  • Dave R
    I have OpenCL running on CaptureOne 11.1 and see no problem with my X-Pro 1 files. I can't find any reference to Fuji X-Tans on the link you gave but it was updated on 11th of April.

    Dave
    0
  • Alexander
    Product Manager
    That one line is outdated, as OpenCL is indeed supported for X-Trans files in Capture One 11. Good catch!
    0
  • TERRY LEUNG
    thx for the confirmation!

    btw, I suggest it is time to update the list of what GPU or graphics cards are supported 😄
    0
  • SFA
    [quote="NN635412133785466950UL" wrote:


    btw, I suggest it is time to update the list of what GPU or graphics cards are supported 😄


    That is probably an impossible task by now.

    The whole point of making use of what should be an "industry standard" is that there should be no need to validate every iteration by every manufacturer and follow that up with testing every manufacturer/developer initiated driver update in every possible Mac or PC hardware configuration.
    0
  • Martin Wilson
    [quote="SFA" wrote:
    [quote="NN635412133785466950UL" wrote:


    btw, I suggest it is time to update the list of what GPU or graphics cards are supported 😄


    That is probably an impossible task by now.

    The whole point of making use of what should be an "industry standard" is that there should be no need to validate every iteration by every manufacturer and follow that up with testing every manufacturer/developer initiated driver update in every possible Mac or PC hardware configuration.


    My experience as a long time programme and software project manager tells me that "SHOULD" is a word one must never assume with software or computer hardware! 😉 One should always test that it is fully "industry standard".
    0
  • SFA
    [quote="MPW1950-2" wrote:
    [quote="SFA" wrote:
    [quote="NN635412133785466950UL" wrote:


    btw, I suggest it is time to update the list of what GPU or graphics cards are supported 😄


    That is probably an impossible task by now.

    The whole point of making use of what should be an "industry standard" is that there should be no need to validate every iteration by every manufacturer and follow that up with testing every manufacturer/developer initiated driver update in every possible Mac or PC hardware configuration.


    My experience as a long time programme and software project manager tells me that "SHOULD" is a word one must never assume with software or computer hardware! 😉 One should always test that it is fully "industry standard".


    In the case of things like GPU cards with multiple manufacturers and fabs and ever "evolving" software and drivers together with different target markets I doubt there is a set of standards that can be entirely relied upon.

    Nor is it likely to be possible (or even sensible) to try to keep up to date with all of the latest changes. After all, some (possibly most) of the GPUs may never be used by a C1 user so it would be extremely pointless to be proactive with testing all of them. And in that situation there would be no point in trying to publish a list of supported and unsupported cards since it would likely NEVER be accurate no matter how much resource one paid for to try to test them.


    Grant
    0

Post is closed for comments.