Skip to main content

New License Model: Changes to the way licensing, updates, and upgrades work

Comments

1064 comments

  • Thomas Kyhn Rovsing Hjørnet
    Top Commenter

    @Francesco Terracciano

    Regarding the distribution of license types, a poll from a few days ago in the Paul Reiffer Live - The Photographic Community group on Facebook (no idea how representative this is):

    0
  • BeO
    Top Commenter

    Thomas Kyhn Rovsing Hjørnet

    Interesting. Do you know how many have replied to the poll?

    C1 draws a different picture, over their entire customer base I assume:

    While over half of our users are on a subscription and close to 80% of new users choose a subscription, we still understand that perpetual licenses are important for many of you. 

    0
  • Francesco Terracciano

    @Pip I agree. Adobe looks more appealing
    @Thomas Kyhn Thank you for sharing
    @BeO I think most of professionals, probably subscribers, don't follow live on YouTube. It may explain the difference

    0
  • Thomas Kyhn Rovsing Hjørnet
    Top Commenter

    Do you know how many have replied to the poll?

    It says 290 now.

    0
  • Thomas Kyhn Rovsing Hjørnet
    Top Commenter

    bernhard sanders:

    Again from my perspective - C1, your RAW engine is great (amongst others ie we have a choice), imho remove the DAM functionality which is, afaik, not compatible with most other professional DAM-s ( Virtual copies and Versions), offer that instead as an extra (Version Plus like Photomechanic does), and concentrate on further improvement on IQ results for C1 minus DAM for a reasonable price as perpetual. Than WE would have a choice what to buy.

    As Capture One's handling of catalogues/metadata is indeed very poor, I'm hoping that rather than abandon the DAM function they'll improve it as an integrated part of the application. I have Photo Mechanic Plus, but I'm not particularly fond of it; it's inefficient, the interface is clunky, it's unable to handle variants, etc. I use Peakto as well, and while it has potential, it isn't yet fully functional for Capture One; but considering its improvements over the last few months, there's reason to expect it will, eventually, be a good supplement to Capture One. Still, using an additional application for handling your Capture One catalogue(s) for the sole reason that Capture One is unable to do this itself, obviously isn't ideal.

    0
  • Weldon Thomson

    Capture One -

    Screw me once, shame on you. Screw me twice, shame on me.

    0
  • ernst.w

    @Thomas Kyhn

    > I'm hoping that rather than abandon the DAM function they'll improve it as an integrated part of the application.

    I agree. If I am forced to change to another software I would prefer an integrated solution again. Even if it is so poor as C1 solution.

    0
  • truepictures

    Oh, it looks like Santa has put plenty of presents and the Christmas tree. I see lots of gift cards from Adobe and DXO. And if I look closely, there are also ON1 and Luminar vouchers hidden among the homemade photo calendars.

    So now everyone is obviously busy trying out their gifts and getting rid of the tiresome discussion about and with CO. In a few weeks at the latest, when the "loyalty" cat is let out of the bag, there will be new "fodder". Probably no one will really like it. The mountain gave birth to a pebble. And once again CO will have done everything right: simply stoically bounce off all criticism, starve the critics on the outstretched arm and finally leave the battlefield as a radiant victor. In a few weeks, this episode will also be history and no (new) subscriber will ever know who he got involved with. A pity too ...

    0
  • Piotr Dobrowolski

    Funny thing is... when such things are announced people are looking for other solutions...while if such announcement was not placed they would not...so before I would not even think of switching to  DXO: but having some free hours I tested the last version, and for my work with wide and TS lenses it seems their corrections possibilities including volumetric corrections for wide lenses and Viewpoint "free" corrections far superior than what we have in C1. Not even talking about "import free" DAM yet...So I ended up buying DXO package. I like the C1 colors better (not corrected), export speed and healing tool which is better especially when near the image borders, not telling about crop constraint to image content. So I will use both tools hoping the loyalty program will not make me to break the cooperation or skip upgrades. Now looking for best way to synchronize the already made settings both ways. Not going to Adobe since my CS license which was good for couple years become bad in their eyes and I hate software renting.

    0
  • BeO
    Top Commenter

    Simply put, a Roadmap is a list of milestones, i.e. features with dates.

    0
  • ernst.w

    Please post any answers. I‘m not on Twitter.

    0
  • Claudia Mathys

    ernst.w
    BeO

    Perhaps you have linkedin?

    I wrote it there, because I've neither Twitter:
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/rafael-orta/?originalSubdomain=dk

     

    0
  • Christian VIEL

    In the faq you say :

    Q: I have a license for Capture One Pro 23 I purchased before February 1st, 2023 and I will get free feature updates until September 30, 2023. After that date, what happens if I want to get the latest version of Capture One Pro?

    A: You will need to buy a new copy of Capture One Pro to be covered under our new license model from October 1st 2023 onwards.

    My question : what will be the gap between a new subscriber and me?

    0
  • Christian VIEL

    In the faq you say :

    Q: I have a license for Capture One 22 or older. What are my options?

    A: If you are happy on your current version of Capture One Pro, great! If you want the latest version of Capture One Pro after February 1, 2023, you will need to purchase a new software license.

    If you are considering moving to Capture One Pro 23, our upgrade pricing (33% off the full price) is open to you until January 31, 2023.

    Or if you’d like to receive all our updates as we release them, you may wish to try out one of our subscription plans.

    My question:  "What will the new subscription plans"? It is incredible not to have the data necessary for making a choice!

    If you follow this way, I will consider a go to another soft.

     

    0
  • Claudia Mathys

    Udo van den Heuvel

    Hi Udo! Do you have LinkedIn? Why you don't write this to the CEO? :-)
    Wish you a good new year, if it's with or without C1 :-)

     

    0
  • J M Smith

    Udo van den Heuvel

    Hahahahaha, love it!!!

    0
  • Jeffrey Kogler

    @Mark Hopgood, even though I'm only vaguely familiar with the Filmora brand and had never heard of Daniel Batal until now, I'm hoping C1 don't go down the road of trashing their brand as Filmora seem intent on doing.

    There is also an element of legal jeopardy here.  In Filmora's case they seem to have made an offer with certain terms and conditions; customers have accepted that offer via their purchase; that is a contract.  If Filmora breach that contract they leave themselves open to being sued.  Fortunately for them their customers probably don't possess the legal or financial resources to do so.

    Recent discussions here and on social media have also made me aware to be more sceptical of the published views of brand ambassadors more generally.

    Jeff

     

    0
  • ALESSIO FURLAN

    Jeffrey Kogler 

    It depends on the type of ambassador and the type of contract.

    I am an Italian content creator and I receive many collaboration proposals. I also signed contracts with some brands.

    But there are various types of contract. I only sign those where I also have the freedom to say the things that are not good. And I guarantee you that many brands want to know when there are things that are not good, to improve them.

    An example is my collaboration with Insta360, they have improved many products also thanks to the reports I made on defects and shortcomings. Reports I made publicly in my videos.

    0
  • Jeffrey Kogler

    @Alessio Furlan. Yes it seems that the Filmora issue is heading in the right direction.

    And thank you for your information with respect to your own connection with companies/products.

    Jeff

    0
  • Paul Reiffer

    Jeffrey Kogler

    If it helps with some insight, I can categorically say that Capture One actively encourage constructive criticism and feedback on issues from all ambassadors, as they do customers too.

    I think there’s sometimes a challenge “seeing through the mist”, so to speak, to get to the root of a problem or feeling but in this particular case it’s pretty clear…!

    From my own perspective, you’ll find me as critical as many other users when things go wrong (indeed, there are many recordings of such!) - and people might also forget that 95% of my time is spent as a commercial photographer , not as a badge-collecting ambassadorship addict. In other words, when things aren’t right, it directly affects my business and income - and I approach my feedback to Capture One with that viewpoint.

    I can’t speak for other actual Capture One ambassadors, but I know the message from “mother ship” has always been to be open, challenging and critical when it counts in order to make the product better.

    (Which I tend to do, in droves… ;-)

    0
  • Class A

    @Paul Reiffer

    You wrote "... I know the message from “mother ship” has always been to be open, challenging and critical when it counts in order to make the product better."

    Unfortunately, that hasn't always been my experience.

    I'd like to first say that I had many positive and constructive interactions with a good number of Capture One employees. There are definitely great people working for Capture One.

    However, at least one person doesn't have the openness you describe. I was shadow banned from Capture One's YouTube videos. This means it was a "silent" ban in the sense that I could still see my comments but nobody else could. I would have had no idea that my comments were invisible to everyone else, had I not once tried to read a comment from me while being logged in with another account.

    I was unhappy because
    - I was not properly banned, i.e., was insidiously led to believe that I wasn't banned.

    - I obviously was not given any reason as to why my comments were not welcome.

    When I enquired about the ban, I was told that I had made feature requests in my comments and that these are not allowed as video comments.

    I found that hard to believe since,

    a) a lot of other people make feature request in video comments and are not banned.

    b) I was neither given a warning, nor a notification.

    How is one supposed to not do something if one is never told about the rule? I still find it hard to believe that such a rule a actually exists. If it does, it is very poorly enforced.

    I was told my ban was lifted and I appreciate that but at the same time some of my historic comments remain hidden which I find odd. 

    While I am critical at times, I always try to be polite and constructive. I really don't think there were any grounds to shadow ban me.

    0
  • Paul Reiffer

    Class A

    As I mentioned - in my post that related specifically to the concerns raised by Jeffrey about brand ambassadors - this was a comment specifically relating to the messaging that goes to us *as* brand ambassadors, so not relevant to your scenario.

    Your own personal issues/experiences may vary, but the message to brand ambassadors is clear - and I've not heard of any other customers being "banned" from any channels unless they've been abusive or posting irrelevant content over and over again (effectively spam). On your specific case, I'm afraid I can't help, as I don't know the background and didn't make the decision 😎

    0
  • Jeffrey Kogler

    @Paul Reiffer, thanks for your advice. I shall take it into account.

    0
  • Class A

    @Paul Reiffer

    Thanks a lot for the pointer, much appreciated!

    I'll try to make it.

    0
  • Thomas Kyhn Rovsing Hjørnet
    Top Commenter

    @Paul Reiffer

    Thanks for sharing – that sounds interesting.

    It would be very interesting to know what he thinks of Capture One's (perceived) lack of openness and lack of engagement with users (other than around sharing photos on social media), not least in the perspective of his 2021 open letter and the subsequent interview – mentioned earlier in this thread – where he talks specifically about openness.

    Open letter: captureone[DOT]com/blog/a-letter-from-our-new-ceo

    Interview: imaging-resource[DOT]com/news/2021/03/17/interview-with-capture-ones-ceo-rafael-orta

    [Re-posted to avoid the "pending approval" bin.]

    0
  • truepictures

    As expected, the storm of indignation has died down, not even a breeze. Is this the famous calm before the storm? Or have all the dissatisfied already migrated to the various competitors and are no longer following the presentation of the announced loyalty programme? As predicted: the caravan moves on, CO comes off as the winner and leaves hundreds of corpses behind.

    Kind of a shame it had to end this way. As a CO user, one is helpless and powerless in the face of CO's decisions. Just like in a long-term relationship in which you actually felt comfortable. And suddenly you are left with the offer "we can stay friends". That has rarely worked.

    And yet I am curious. What would my price have been? 

    0
  • Richard Reader

    I think that we've reached a point where, from the position of C1 perpetual licence holders, there is little else to say. Hundreds have posted here and hundreds more have posted in other forums their concerns following the initial announcement. It must be clear to those at C1 that a sizable element of their customer base is unhappy, yet the powers that be have not said anything to calm the disquiet. To me this is ominous; I cannot see C1, or any seriously minded company, having the tenacity to hold out from saying anything to calm matters down in a situation where their reputation is taking a dent, only to effectively say in a forthcoming announcement (that they must know the contents of), that everything is OK, we had no need to worry and things are going to be better still for perpetual licence holders in the future. That smacks of taking customers for a ride at the customers' expense, particularly since many will have spent valuable time and resources researching alternative software.

    0
  • Henk de Haan

    J M Smith

    Capture One also has the 'Express' license for Fujifilm, Sony and Nikon cameras (which is a free crippled version of Capture One Pro). It would be nice if this version could export edits made with the Pro version (but not be able to change them). In this way ex-subscription users (and users with old perpetual licenses) can still access their digital assets with the latest bugfixes.

    0
  • truepictures

    @ J M Smith
    "According to this page (https://helpx.adobe.com/manage-account/using/cancel-subscription.html), upon canceling a Creative Cloud subscription "You can continue to access all your photos on your local hard drive through Lightroom for the desktop. You can continue to import and organize photos and output your edited photos through Export, Publish, Print, Web, or Slideshow. Access to the Develop & Map modules and Lightroom for mobile is not available after your membership ends."

    Thank you for the link. I didn't know that in such detail. And this is exactly where the snag is: "Access to the Develop ... is not available after your membership ends."

    By far the most important and essential function of LR (and also CO) is image processing. And this is deactivated when the subscription is cancelled. I can only export the already processed images without further processing (development), but I cannot edit them and readjust them if necessary. This does not really help and would not be an advantage. For further processing of existing or new images, I would have to change to a new software in any case and then also migrate all existing images from LR to the new software.

    My suggestion would be that when the subscription is cancelled (after one year at the earliest), the range of functions of the image editing software is "frozen". However, the full range of functions would be retained at the time of cancellation. After all, one should have acquired this right of use after one year of subscription fees.
    If one wants to join again at a later date, one could then immediately benefit from new functions by subscription. But only after another 12 months of uninterrupted subscription would one have acquired a right of use with the full range of functions again after cancellation. I think that would serve both the company and the customer.

    0
  • Paul Reiffer

    @...

    (and the announcement on the interview with the CEO on 2nd of Feb. - the day after the communicated changes will be valid!!)

    Actually, the timing is due to my own travel schedule (as the host of the session) as I'm out of the country until that date.  Rafael was happy to do it sooner, but it's not possible for me.

    No conspiracy there. 😎

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.