Propheticus
- Total activity 390
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 46
- Subscriptions 141
Comments
Recent activity by Propheticus-
And what specific problem is that? The above is a more generic complaint that 15.3 is buggy. While I agree there is plenty of bugs and quirks to be found in C1 (I really feel like a beta tester s...
-
I see no mention in the release notes of the update checker being fixed, so fyi: You recommend staying up to date by checking for updates via "Help -> Check for Updates on Windows" from within C1.V...
-
You've read wrong. Version 15.3.1 is very much available still.The issue is that the version 15.3.0 update checker does not show an update is available. One of the many small bugs an quirks found i...
-
That does look like there's quite a few of them and this is only a part of the photo. I'd hope they're not actual permanent hot pixels, but rather noise.They're obviously not dust specks. Are th...
-
You are correct, the 16-80 lens does not have a C1 developed profile and instead defaults to the manufacturer profile stored in the image's metadata. I have requested it to be added -and so did oth...
-
Not exactly broken, but indeed limited. And when a limit is reached, for instance vertical correction maxed out at 75, it also impacts horizontal correction. Keystone correction using horizontal+ve...
-
Strangely, it seems horizontal correction is also impacted when the vertical slider's limit is reached. Might be because there's a multi-way interaction between [rotation + vertical + horizontal]. ...
-
For me keystone is working up until a limit. Until this limit, using the horizontal+vertical combined guides and amount set to 100% results in a perfect rectangle. This does make buildings look unn...
-
I've looked at dark areas in some of my Fujifilm pictures at 200% and only found single coloured (blue) pixels in high ISO + longer exposure like 1/6s. These coloured pixels are emphasized when: ...
-
Not sure what you're sorry for. Guessing you posted something very similar to my post? Anyway, no foul in hearing the same advise validated by multiple sources :)